Re: [PATCH] apr_thread_cond_wait bug/problem on WIN32

2004-03-14 Thread Jeff Trawick
Klaus Keppler wrote: [RESENT because I got no response for about two weeks...] fine to report/discuss here but if no response in that period of time it is very likely that it has scrolled off the radar please report the problem via the bug database at http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/index.html

Re: PATCH: apr_reslist_invalidate

2004-03-14 Thread Jeff Trawick
Nick Kew wrote: Rationale: if an module gets a resource that proves to be bad (e.g. a connection that's gone away), it shouldn't be returned to the pool to be given out again. We should invalidate it. I'm proposing the following patch, though I'm not sure whether or not we should free_container in

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move APR to the subversion repository

2004-03-14 Thread Jeff Trawick
Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi, On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 07:25:49PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: I hereby would like to propose that we move APR to the Subversion repository at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/. -1 I'm against immediate adoption of SVN for purely community-based reasons, but not for techn

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move APR to the subversion repository

2004-03-14 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Cliff Woolley wrote: > I'll put my heads together with the PMC and see what we can come up > with. Umm... just reread that... "my heads"... *crosses all (four? eight? ;) eyes*... okay... I need a vacation ;)

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move APR to the subversion repository

2004-03-14 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Guenter Knauf wrote: > For what is it good for that I'm familiar with CVS, have it on my > machine, and am able to contribute patches, if I'm not able to commit > them, and my posts get mostly ignored (as with many other posts too) > because either the commiters have no time f

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move APR to the subversion repository

2004-03-14 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, > On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 07:25:49PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: >> I hereby would like to propose that we move APR to the Subversion >> repository at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/. > -1 > I'm against immediate adoption of SVN for purely community-based > reasons, but not for technical re

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move APR to the subversion repository

2004-03-14 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 07:25:49PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: > I hereby would like to propose that we move APR to the Subversion > repository at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/. -1 I'm against immediate adoption of SVN for purely community-based reasons, but not for technical reasons. I belie

Bug report for APR [2004/03/14]

2004-03-14 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: PATCH: Determine how many bytes are waiting to be read from a socket

2004-03-14 Thread Robert Norris
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:48:52PM -0600, Scott Lamb wrote: > >Interesting. I've never actually seen select() and friends do this, but > >of course there's lots of broken OSes out there. > > Well, they don't even consider it to be broken. I've found the message > in question: > >

RESEND: PATCH: Update requested events for a descriptor that is already in a poll set

2004-03-14 Thread Robert Norris
[ I'm resending this, because I didn't get any responses to it the first time. ] Attached is a patch that adds a function apr_pollset_update(). This updates the list of requested events for the descriptor in the underlying implementation for a descriptor that is already in a pollset. It works wel

Re: cvs commit: apr/build apr_rules.mk.in gen-build.py

2004-03-14 Thread Brian Havard
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:33:29 +1000 (EST), Brian Havard wrote: >On 21 Feb 2004 00:31:49 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>gstein 2004/02/20 16:31:49 >> >> Modified:.build.conf configure.in >> buildapr_rules.mk.in gen-build.py >> Log: >> Fix the generation of