On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 07:54:10PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
As discussed back in June enum names in the apr_filetype_e entry are
polluting the APR_ defines namespace and it's hard to grok what APR_REG
means when it's used in the code. I've finally started to work on these as
I'm finishing
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 09:21:17PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 07:53 PM 9/17/2004, you wrote:
and the rename of apr_file_permissions group:
s/APR_/APR_FILEPROT_/
Veto - defer for 2.0
There is no reason to wait until 2.0. The versioning guidelines allow us
to provide new symbolic
Hi,
Trying for a third week :).
I've posted couple of patches for apr that seems to be
lost somewhere. There has been some discussion on
some of them, so I'm sending them all at once with
brief explanation for each.
1. test_makefile_win.patch
The apr/test/Makefile.win is missing a target to build
Mladen Turk wrote:
Trying for a third week :).
I've posted couple of patches for apr that seems to be
lost somewhere. There has been some discussion on
some of them, so I'm sending them all at once with
brief explanation for each.
I assume the silence represents a lack of disagreement :) I will
Hi!
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:47:48PM +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
APR_DECLARE(apr_status_t) apr_thread_join(apr_status_t *retval,
apr_thread_t *thd)
{
-apr_status_t rv;
-
+apr_status_t rv = APR_SUCCESS;
+
+if (!thd-td) {
+
At 09:15 AM 9/19/2004, Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 09:21:17PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 07:53 PM 9/17/2004, you wrote:
and the rename of apr_file_permissions group:
s/APR_/APR_FILEPROT_/
Veto - defer for 2.0
There is no reason to wait until 2.0. The versioning
At 10:47 AM 9/19/2004, Mladen Turk wrote:
Trying for a third week :).
Keep trying :) Several project releases distracted a number
of users of this list...
so I'm sending them all at once with brief explanation for each.
Actually, it inhibits discussion to do that :( I would like
to see Ben
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Trying for a third week :) .
Keep trying :) Several project releases distracted a number
of users of this list...
Don't worry, someone said that Croats are pretty stubborn :) .
For your 1. and 3. and 4. they are fine, simply commit them,
+1 to fix in both head
Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 07:54:10PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
As discussed back in June enum names in the apr_filetype_e entry are
polluting the APR_ defines namespace and it's hard to grok what APR_REG
means when it's used in the code. I've finally started to work on these as
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:20:59PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
...
And the #ifndef wrappers are not needed. Just define the old names in
terms of the new.
yes, yes, inside apr they won't be needed. They will be needed inside
projects supporting more than one apr generation.
Greg Stein wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:20:59PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
...
And the #ifndef wrappers are not needed. Just define the old names in
terms of the new.
yes, yes, inside apr they won't be needed. They will be needed inside
projects supporting more than one apr
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 08:34 PM 9/17/2004, you wrote:
This group wasn't discussed before, but it suffers from the same problem.
#define APR_READ 0x1 /** Open the file for reading */
#define APR_WRITE 0x2 /** Open the file for writing */
#define APR_CREATE
13 matches
Mail list logo
