On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
Or if it does, -1 veto on either bumping the APR major version or
creating a branch or making toast with jam before Allan submits a patch
for review on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay, well, that means that for progress to be made, some form of patch
needs to get
--On Thursday, November 25, 2004 10:44 AM + Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd like to propose also to drop autoconf 2.13 support on the trunk.
+1. -- justin
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Now that 1.0.x is branched, svn is up and running and most
of the headaches are diminishing with the help of a bit
of advil...
I see no reason for Stas not to commit his APR_ file macro
renames on 1.1.x - it's commit-then-review so be my guest.
I've committed to 1.1 the
Stas Bekman wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Now that 1.0.x is branched, svn is up and running and most
of the headaches are diminishing with the help of a bit
of advil...
I see no reason for Stas not to commit his APR_ file macro
renames on 1.1.x - it's commit-then-review so be my guest.
I've
