On 4 Dec 2004 23:40:37 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Sat Dec 4 15:40:37 2004
New Revision: 109832
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=109832
Log:
* test/testfile.c: Add a test for apr_file_writev().
* file_io/unix/readwrite.c: Try to
Jeff Trawick wrote:
we're hosed here if apr_file_write() can only write part of the data
(tbytes is vec[i].iov_len and rv is APR_SUCCESS); don't you also
need to bail if tbytes vec[i].iov_len?
Committed r109865 which uses apr_file_write_full() to hopefully write
the entire iovec.
According
Guys,
any reason why apr_sha1_* are declared as void, and apr_md*_* are
apr_status_t? Any objections (I have patch plus tests ready to go) for
fixing this on HEAD?
-T
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 00:01:05 -0700, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
we're hosed here if apr_file_write() can only write part of the data
(tbytes is vec[i].iov_len and rv is APR_SUCCESS); don't you also
need to bail if tbytes vec[i].iov_len?
Committed r109865
I'm looking into using apr for an existing application, so that I can
use its hash tables, pools, rings, atomic operations, etc. The concern I
have is that the application is already multi-threaded (using pthreads)
and I'm not ready to re-engineer the entire codebase... I need to start
small
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 00:01:05 -0700, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
we're hosed here if apr_file_write() can only write part of the data
(tbytes is vec[i].iov_len and rv is APR_SUCCESS); don't you also
need to bail if tbytes vec[i].iov_len?
Paul Querna wrote:
2) fix the code formatting
Can this please be more specific? I reviewed the style guide at
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/styleguide.html and I believe all of the
code I have modified here is within those guidelines.
I believe what he's referring to is the lack of spaces
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 02:17:31AM -, Paul Querna wrote:
--- apr/apr/trunk/file_io/unix/fullrw.c (original)
+++ apr/apr/trunk/file_io/unix/fullrw.c Sat Dec 4 18:17:30 2004
@@ -60,3 +60,37 @@
return status;
}
+
+APR_DECLARE(apr_status_t)
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 10:35:11AM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 00:01:05 -0700, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1) write_full() has the wrong semantics for apr_file_writev();
apr_file_writev() and apr_file_write() are not supposed to block
Thanks, I
Joe Orton wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 10:35:11AM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 00:01:05 -0700, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1) write_full() has the wrong semantics for apr_file_writev();
apr_file_writev() and apr_file_write() are not supposed to block
10 matches
Mail list logo
