Hi,
Fixed the 1.4.x branch win32 crypto API and modules
(Mostly by adding missing build files and one API bug)
They can now compile using Mozilla's xulrunner SDK and any OpenSSSL SDK.
We could reconsider re-tagging 1.4.0 (or just making 1.4.1)
Regards
--
^TM
On 7 Dec 2011, at 08:58, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Fixed the 1.4.x branch win32 crypto API and modules
(Mostly by adding missing build files and one API bug)
They can now compile using Mozilla's xulrunner SDK and any OpenSSSL SDK.
We could reconsider re-tagging 1.4.0 (or just
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 7 Dec 2011, at 08:58, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Fixed the 1.4.x branch win32 crypto API and modules
(Mostly by adding missing build files and one API bug)
They can now compile using Mozilla's xulrunner SDK and
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 7 Dec 2011, at 08:58, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Fixed the 1.4.x branch win32 crypto API and modules
(Mostly by adding missing build files and one API bug)
They can now compile using Mozilla's xulrunner SDK and any OpenSSSL SDK.
We could
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Hi all,
Tarballs/zipballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/.
New in apr-util v1.4 is the apr_crypto interface, and a fix for LDAP on
Solaris. Full CHANGES are here:
On 07 Dec 2011, at 7:10 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
stuff to consider before 1.4.1
different autotools versions compared with 1.3.12? (not always a
problem, but could lead to unintended glitches???)
I've been using autoconf 2.64 and libtool 1.5.26
The autotools used are the defaults that
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 07 Dec 2011, at 7:10 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
stuff to consider before 1.4.1
different autotools versions compared with 1.3.12? (not always a
problem, but could lead to unintended glitches???)
I've been using
On 07 Dec 2011, at 7:32 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Using the same autoconf and libtool as before should cost you less
than 10 minutes, it makes it trivial to review more of the proposed
tarball, and it essentially guarantees no regressions in certain
aspects of the release.
What could be
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 07 Dec 2011, at 7:32 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Using the same autoconf and libtool as before should cost you less
than 10 minutes, it makes it trivial to review more of the proposed
tarball, and it essentially guarantees
Just to confirm, this only gets compiled if the user has added a --with
option specific to nss, right? Otherwise it impacts our license.
Roy
On Dec 7, 2011, at 12:38 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Dec 7 08:38:54 2011
New Revision: 1211334
URL:
On Wednesday 07 December 2011, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 7 Dec 2011, at 13:54, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
I've got a report that apr-util/ldap 1.3.12 does not build on
Debian unstable currently, presumably due to toolchain changes.
If you wait another 6 hours or so, I could check
On 07 Dec 2011, at 8:17 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Just to confirm, this only gets compiled if the user has added a --with
option specific to nss, right? Otherwise it impacts our license.
Can't speak for Windows, but for Unix, yes. Without --with-crypto and
--with-crypto-nss, the default is
On 12/07/2011 07:17 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Just to confirm, this only gets compiled if the user has added a --with
option specific to nss, right? Otherwise it impacts our license.
Actually it's
editing apu.hw and setting APU_HAVE_CRYPTO to 1, and then
nmake -f Makefile.win
On 07 Dec 2011, at 8:17 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
The People build APR part is irrelevant. The versions of autoconf
and libtool used so far are anything but arbitrary. They are known to
work for APR users on a variety of platforms. You're throwing away
fixes we have been shipping with for
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 07 Dec 2011, at 8:17 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
The People build APR part is irrelevant. The versions of autoconf
and libtool used so far are anything but arbitrary. They are known to
work for APR users on a variety of
On 12/7/2011 10:54 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/07/2011 07:17 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Just to confirm, this only gets compiled if the user has added a --with
option specific to nss, right? Otherwise it impacts our license.
Actually it's
editing apu.hw and setting APU_HAVE_CRYPTO to 1,
On 12/7/2011 9:22 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
I am far more comfortable choosing a set of autotools shipped with and
supported by a major distribution than trying to cook up my own combination -
Redhat have already found an option that works, and if it isn't broken, I
don't believe we
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:48:26PM -0800, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/6/2011 4:36 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
@@ -207,6 +274,10 @@ APR_DECLARE(int) apr_fnmatch(const char *pattern,
const char *mismatch = NULL;
int matchlen = 0;
+if (strnlen(pattern, APR_PATH_MAX) ==
On 07.12.2011 18:10, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Graham Leggettminf...@sharp.fm wrote:
diff -ru apr-util-1.3.12/build/config.guess apr-util-1.4.0/build/config.guess
config.guess is not an autotool.
apr-util buildconf should copy the file in from the apr against
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 07.12.2011 18:10, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Graham Leggettminf...@sharp.fm wrote:
diff -ru apr-util-1.3.12/build/config.guess
apr-util-1.4.0/build/config.guess
config.guess is not an
On 08 Dec 2011, at 12:56 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
There's a parameter on release.sh which gets passed to apr-util
buildconf. If it is not passed to release.sh it looks like it will
look in ../apr.
As it is not coming from the autotools, I guess Graham would have to
look for where it might
On 07.12.2011 23:56, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 07.12.2011 18:10, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Graham Leggettminf...@sharp.fmwrote:
diff -ru apr-util-1.3.12/build/config.guess
On 08 Dec 2011, at 1:07 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:52 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:52:27 2011
New Revision: 1211688
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1211688view=rev
Log:
Tag v1.4.1.
Added:
apr/apr-util/tags/1.4.1/
Tagging was done like this:
svn copy https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/branches/1.4.x
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/tags/1.4.1
/me does^Wwould've done
svn cp ^/apr/apr-util/branches/1.4.x/ ^/apr/apr-util/tags/1.4.1
Regards,
Graham
--
i
--
Igor Galić
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 08 Dec 2011, at 12:56 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
There's a parameter on release.sh which gets passed to apr-util
buildconf. If it is not passed to release.sh it looks like it will
look in ../apr.
As it is not coming
2011/12/7 Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org:
Tagging was done like this:
svn copy https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/branches/1.4.x
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/tags/1.4.1
/me does^Wwould've done
svn cp ^/apr/apr-util/branches/1.4.x/ ^/apr/apr-util/tags/1.4.1
Hi all,
Tarballs/zipballs are at
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/autoconf-2.68+libtool-2.4.2/.
New in apr-util v1.4 is the apr_crypto interface, and a fix for LDAP on
Solaris. Full CHANGES are here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/tags/1.4.1/CHANGES
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-util
- Original Message -
On 08 Dec 2011, at 12:56 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
There's a parameter on release.sh which gets passed to apr-util
buildconf. If it is not passed to release.sh it looks like it will
look in ../apr.
As it is not coming from the autotools, I guess Graham
IIRC this is required so that release.sh creates a
command-line-build-able apr-util, which is an expectation of a
release.
(I will go ahead and plead confused in advance just in case.)
On 12/7/2011 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:48:26PM -0800, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/6/2011 4:36 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
@@ -207,6 +274,10 @@ APR_DECLARE(int) apr_fnmatch(const char *pattern,
const char *mismatch = NULL;
int matchlen = 0;
+
On 12/7/2011 3:28 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
IIRC this is required so that release.sh creates a
command-line-build-able apr-util, which is an expectation of a
release.
(I will go ahead and plead confused in advance just in case.)
Yes, the 'initial' build on a given branch needs these exported
On 12/07/2011 09:32 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/7/2011 10:54 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/07/2011 07:17 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Just to confirm, this only gets compiled if the user has added a --with
option specific to nss, right? Otherwise it impacts our license.
Actually it's
32 matches
Mail list logo
