Bug report for APR [2014/01/19]

2014-01-18 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: Was your APR patch ignored?

2014-01-18 Thread Mattias Engdegård
[replying to the APR list this time] 18 jan 2014 kl. 14.36 skrev Jeff Trawick: If it was posted only to the mailing list, make sure there is a bug opened for it at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ Thank you, the getopt error code patch is now at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

Re: Was your APR patch ignored?

2014-01-18 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > If it was posted only to the mailing list, make sure there is a bug opened > for it at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ > > To clarify something that somebody just e-mailed me directly about: There's nothing inherently wrong with posting

Re: apr 1.5.x in a couple of weeks?

2014-01-18 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 17.01.2014 16:59, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > We already have a couple of fixes for build regressions and a critical > > functional fix for the new FreeBSD release. (See below.) > > > > Others I'm interested in pushing along personally are th

Was your APR patch ignored?

2014-01-18 Thread Jeff Trawick
If it was posted only to the mailing list, make sure there is a bug opened for it at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/

Re: apr 1.5.x in a couple of weeks?

2014-01-18 Thread Branko Čibej
On 17.01.2014 16:59, Jeff Trawick wrote: > We already have a couple of fixes for build regressions and a critical > functional fix for the new FreeBSD release. (See below.) > > Others I'm interested in pushing along personally are the missing > -DWINNT define in the CMake-based build and the > apr