Re: APR Util Question

2014-02-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Lamb, Joel joel.l...@ftr.com wrote: Thanks Jeff I found the correct version in /usr/lib64, so I removed the symbolic links in /opt/vulture/httpd/lib and it worked. Great! APR folks, shouldn't users normally override the prefix when building the RPMs in

Re: APR Util Question

2014-02-01 Thread Graham Leggett
On 01 Feb 2014, at 3:55 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: APR folks, shouldn't users normally override the prefix when building the RPMs in order to leave the system-provided libraries and anything depending on them untouched? They shouldn't, no. RPMs are system libraries by

Re: APR Util Question

2014-02-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: On 01 Feb 2014, at 3:55 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: APR folks, shouldn't users normally override the prefix when building the RPMs in order to leave the system-provided libraries and anything depending on

Re: APR Util Question

2014-02-01 Thread Graham Leggett
On 01 Feb 2014, at 4:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: I don't understand that... I guess the reasons that these particular RPMs are system libraries are: * they use the same package names as the normal APR packages for RHEL/Fedora-based systems * (unless some special effort

Bug report for APR [2014/02/02]

2014-02-01 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned