On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Lamb, Joel joel.l...@ftr.com wrote:
Thanks Jeff
I found the correct version in /usr/lib64, so I removed the symbolic links
in /opt/vulture/httpd/lib and it worked.
Great!
APR folks, shouldn't users normally override the prefix when building the
RPMs in
On 01 Feb 2014, at 3:55 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
APR folks, shouldn't users normally override the prefix when building the
RPMs in order to leave the system-provided libraries and anything depending
on them untouched?
They shouldn't, no. RPMs are system libraries by
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 01 Feb 2014, at 3:55 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
APR folks, shouldn't users normally override the prefix when building
the RPMs in order to leave the system-provided libraries and anything
depending on
On 01 Feb 2014, at 4:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand that...
I guess the reasons that these particular RPMs are system libraries are:
* they use the same package names as the normal APR packages for
RHEL/Fedora-based systems
* (unless some special effort
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned