Re: Any concerns with a TR of apr 1.5.2 on Saturday a.m.?

2015-04-22 Thread Gregg Smith
On 4/22/2015 3:19 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: (subject says it all) Did we ever decide the best way to handle apr_atomic.c on VC 2013+? PR 57191. As often as APR is released, it would be nice to get something done this time around, even if it's not the perfect solution. It has to better than

Any concerns with a TR of apr 1.5.2 on Saturday a.m.?

2015-04-22 Thread Jeff Trawick
(subject says it all)

Re: Any concerns with a TR of apr 1.5.2 on Saturday a.m.?

2015-04-22 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 04/22/2015 06:28 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 4/22/2015 3:19 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: (subject says it all) Did we ever decide the best way to handle apr_atomic.c on VC 2013+? PR 57191. As often as APR is released, it would be nice to get something done this time around, even if it's not the