Re: expat upgrade to 2.1.0

2015-11-01 Thread Branko Čibej
On 31.10.2015 18:48, Michael Felt wrote: > I would vote to make external expat the default and/or just remove > expat from apr. That's already been done on trunk (which will become 2.0) but is not something we can backport to the 1.x line, IMO. -- Brane

Bug report for APR [2015/11/01]

2015-11-01 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: expat upgrade to 2.1.0

2015-11-01 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 31 Oct 2015, at 7:48 PM, Michael Felt wrote: > > > I would like to repspond positively on this suggestion that "something" > be done. > > It could be updated, and fortunately expat is not a package

Re: expat upgrade to 2.1.0

2015-11-01 Thread Graham Leggett
On 31 Oct 2015, at 7:48 PM, Michael Felt wrote: > I would like to repspond positively on this suggestion that "something" be > done. > It could be updated, and fortunately expat is not a package with frequent > (security) updates, > but it is external. What may have been

Re: ap_init_rng / apr_random question

2015-11-01 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> IIUC, it takes something like 32k of /dev/random to initialize apr_random. >> >>

Re: expat upgrade to 2.1.0

2015-11-01 Thread olli hauer
On 2015-10-31 18:48, Michael Felt wrote: > On 2015-09-08 12:50, Stefan Hett wrote: >> Hi, >> a while ago I've been pointed by Bert to the fact that APRUtil 1.5.4 >> includes Expat 1.95.7 which is rather old (from October 2003). According >> tohttp://www.libexpat.org/ there has been another 1.95