The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder apr-x64-macosx-trunk
while building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-x64-macosx-trunk/builds/103
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: svn-x64-macosx-dgvrs
Build Reason: The
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder apr-x64-macosx-trunk while
building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-x64-macosx-trunk/builds/102
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: svn-x64-macosx-dgvrs
Build Reason: The
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder apr-x64-macosx-trunk
while building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-x64-macosx-trunk/builds/99
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: svn-x64-macosx-dgvrs
Build Reason: The
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder apr-x64-macosx-trunk while
building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-x64-macosx-trunk/builds/98
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: svn-x64-macosx-dgvrs
Build Reason: The
Am 21.06.2018 um 10:24 schrieb jean-frederic clere:
On 21/06/18 10:04, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 8:00 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
OK if everyone agrees I will just commit my small fix and don't backport
the 2 other revisions.
Are we looking at the same 1.6.x code?
For
On 21/06/18 10:04, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 8:00 AM, jean-frederic clere
> wrote:
>>
>> OK if everyone agrees I will just commit my small fix and don't backport
>> the 2 other revisions.
>
> Are we looking at the same 1.6.x code?
> For me apr_file_buffer_set() locks the
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 8:00 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
> OK if everyone agrees I will just commit my small fix and don't backport
> the 2 other revisions.
Are we looking at the same 1.6.x code?
For me apr_file_buffer_set() locks the mutex unconditionally so it
must unlock it likewise, I
On 21/06/18 01:08, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
> William A Rowe Jr writes:
>
>> Confusing... which patch is missing?
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1808457
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1829962
>>
>> It should not be possible at this point to need 1.x specific code
>>
