On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 8:15 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 2:08 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:46 PM Mladen Turk wrote:
> > >
> > > According to Wikipedia NetWare was discontinued in 2009
> > > and OS/2 in 2001, so if anyone can explain why we have
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 2:08 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:46 PM Mladen Turk wrote:
> >
> > According to Wikipedia NetWare was discontinued in 2009
> > and OS/2 in 2001, so if anyone can explain why we have
> > those in trunk/apr-2 (that will be hopefully released one
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:46 PM Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> According to Wikipedia NetWare was discontinued in 2009
> and OS/2 in 2001, so if anyone can explain why we have
> those in trunk/apr-2 (that will be hopefully released one day).
What about BeOS? We have some specifics for that too.
On 17/01/2022 05:53, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 5:39 AM Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/12/2021 12:35, Yann Ylavic wrote:
After all those CMakeLists changes, is building with cmake now
dedicated to Windows or does/can it work on *nixes too?
I never tried building with cmake
On 17/01/2022 05:58, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 2:55 PM Mladen Turk wrote:
My proposal is to use 0x0603 (aka windows 8.1, windows server 2012r2)
Those are still supported until 2023
-1. Again, that simply limits us to never pick up "modern" tcp/ip symbol
names from
On 17/01/2022 21:01, Paul Smedley wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm still using the os2 APR code for Subversion and Apache2 - I'd like
to keep it. I'd even like to commit my patches at some point.
How realistic is that for apr/trunk, a.k.a 2.0.x?
I mean code in apr 1.x.x will still remain.
Hi Guys,
On 16/1/22 22:46, Brian Havard wrote:
On 1/12/21 9:46 am, Mladen Turk wrote:
BTW did anyone was able to compile trunk on netware or os2
There are bunch of those NWGNUmakefiles and netware subdirs
According to Wikipedia NetWare was discontinued in 2009
and OS/2 in 2001, so if anyone
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:08 PM Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:02 PM William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
>>
>> People will need to change their code to apr-2.x. But in the interim,
>> apr-util 1.7.0
>> aught to have a compat layer to let authors adopt apu_ -> apr_ conventions
>> ahead
