Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm planning on rolling 0.9.5 and 1.0-pre1 tarballs tomorrow (Wednesday)
unless somebody has strenuous objections.
+1
Roll away.
-Fitz
--
Brian W. Fitzpatrick[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.red-bean.com/fitz/
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to propose a vote:
[X] - Yes, I think we're ready for 1.0 now (in both apr and apr-util)
[ ] - No, I think we're not ready for 1.0 because __
-Fitz
--
Brian W. Fitzpatrick[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.red-bean.com/fitz/
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--On Tuesday, August 26, 2003 6:56 AM -0400 Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, that looks reasonable :) I'm still curious about what was happening
on Justin's system.
No clue, either. =) I very well may have gotten what was
Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It has been suggested that I should make my new PRNG (as yet unwritten)
a part of APR, since the original motivation was to fix the UUID
problems in APR.
I'm more than happy to do that, it seems like the best way to get the
cross-platform support it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ * @remark The only reason that the apr_file_open_std* functions exist
+ * is that you may not always have a stderr/out/in on Windows.
Huh? I thought the reason these functions exist is that otherwise you'd
have no portable way of
On Wednesday, July 24, 2002, at 09:45 AM, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
1- Is adding apr_strtoll kosher?
I think so.
2- Should I also add apr_strtoll for completeness?
Do you mean apr_atoll? If so, sure.
-Fitz
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Ryan Bloom wrote:
The original intent for the test suite was that somebody could run the APR
test suite on their implementation of APR, and be sure that they are 100%
compatible. The current test suite doesn't even come close to
implementing that. In fact, most of the
On Tuesday, March 5, 2002, at 12:46 AM, Jason Filby wrote:
Hey all
Looks like you must have MSVC++ to build APR on Windows... isn't
there some way to build it with MingW (GCC ported to win32) or some
other Open Source compiler?
I'm pretty sure that you *can*, but I would be a little leery of
On Thursday, February 21, 2002, at 10:06 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 11:43:04AM +, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Patch attached for review...
Can you please repost as a unified diff?
Sure do... Cheeerios! :)
Any news on this one?
Since
Ghhh. This may have been the bug
-Fitz
On Wednesday, February 6, 2002, at 03:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
striker 02/02/06 13:01:36
Modified:memory/unix apr_pools.c
Log:
Fix a bug where we are NULL'ing too many bytes.
Submitted by:
regularly scheduled commit messages.
-Fitz
On Wednesday, February 6, 2002, at 04:09 PM, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
Ghhh. This may have been the
bug
-Fitz
On Wednesday, February 6, 2002, at 03:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
striker 02/02/06 13:01:36
On Friday, February 23, 2001, at 12:05 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
snip
What are the advantages to maintaining two libraries doing the same thing
with slightly different APIs? Portable run-times are a lot of work, NSPR
is
68KB times the number of platforms it works on. Supporting a portable
run-times
On Friday, February 23, 2001, at 12:47 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
What platforms does APR work on that NSPR doesn't? NSPR is already on all
Windows, Mac, Linux, Solaris, OS/2, AIX, HP-UX, IRIX, OSF. There are also
some weird platforms that I'm not familar with.
BeOS, Unixware, BSDi, Tru64, MacOS X...
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
Anybody recognize that usage output? Certainly looks
Apache-ish, but I can't find it in APR.
It's a Perl script that's part of LWP:
pantheon: ~HEAD -1
Unknown option: 1
Usage: HEAD [-options] url...
-m method use method for the request
On Thursday, February 8, 2001, at 12:59 AM, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
+1. Wow that looks great. A toast to consistency!
i'll drink to that :)
Is there any way you could forward along the conversion script that you
used (Or is that the one you sent last
On Wednesday, February 7, 2001, at 04:54 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
-ltpath=`helpers/PrintPath libtoolize`
-ltpath=`dirname $ltpath`
+libtoolize=`helpers/PrintPath glibtoolize libtoolize`
+ltpath=`dirname $libtool`
I think you meant ltpath=`dirname $libtoolize`
Yup. And I looked that
16 matches
Mail list logo