On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:21 AM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2013-11-22 00:08, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:48 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
sorry for late response to apr-1.5.0 ...
I've done some tests with apr-1.5.0 on FreeBSD 10 (amd64
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
Hi,
On Windows apr_arch_misc.h checks for the ‘WINNT’ define, which was
unconditionally defined on Windows before the CMake build. But now it is no
longer defined. This enables some additional dynamic load
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Stefan Ruppert s...@myarm.com wrote:
Am 03.12.2013 00:37, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 01:34:58 +0100
Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 02.12.2013 01:29, Eric Covener wrote:
I am looking at a httpd bug that causes a hang on
)
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Stefan Ruppert s...@myarm.com wrote:
Am 03.12.2013 14:18, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Stefan Ruppert s...@myarm.com
mailto:s...@myarm.com wrote:
Am 03.12.2013 00:37, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On Mon, 02 Dec 2013
Forwarding thread from Greg, whose post bounced...
(There was a related thread on users@httpd earlier.)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Greg Ames grega...@apache.org
Date: Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: apr / freebsd
To: Richard Kojedzinszky kri...@cflinux.hu
Cc: Jeff
wrote:
On 23.11.2013 14:15, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 22.11.2013 23:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone ever try OpenPA?
https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/openpa/
It's
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:21 AM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2013-11-22 00:08, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:48 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
sorry for late response to apr-1.5.0 ...
I've done some tests with apr-1.5.0 on FreeBSD 10 (amd64
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Note, the only think changed in event now (via
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Note
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:48 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
sorry for late response to apr-1.5.0 ...
I've done some tests with apr-1.5.0 on FreeBSD 10 (amd64)
and it seems there is an issue that breaks apache24.
With apr-1.5.0 apache22 works but apache24 is broken.
apache starts
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
Hi,
Continuing my work to switch my build chain to cmake for apr, apr-util and
httpd I now found the same problem in the optional components of apr-util
that was just fixed in httpd in r1543149: some defines are not
The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Portable Runtime
Project are proud to announce the General Availability of version
1.5.0 of the Apache Portable Runtime library and version 1.5.3
of the Apache Portable Runtime Utility library.
Additionally, this is notification that
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:10 AM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Mon Nov 18 14:10:58 2013
New Revision: 1543033
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1543033
Log:
OSX (Darwin) returns APR_POLLHUP|APR_POLLIN, so the
test for equality fails. Instead, just check for the bit.
Modified:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Nov 18, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
and since we have a useful testcase then maybe it is worth abandoning
the #else path... but YMMV :)
+1 from me :)
okay, it will be on me :)
--
Born
For the mod_perl crash with Event that I posted at the URL below, I would
suspect that there's some affinity with the original worker thread. Can
anyone in mod_perl land confirm?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:57 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Tue Nov 12 16:57:58 2013
New Revision: 1541143
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1541143
Log:
no showstoppers?
Modified:
apr/apr/branches/1.5.x/STATUS
Modified: apr/apr/branches/1.5.x/STATUS
URL:
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
apr-0.9.x has a few fixes queued up, but I don't see any reason to release
them since httpd 2.0.x is retired.
FYI... Notification of the retirement is in tomorrow's 1.5.0/1.5.3
announcement (in svn). The changes
See a mirrored directory like http://apache.xfree.com.ar/apr/binaries/ for
the stuff that users normally see.
I'm planning to wipe these out.
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES files:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.4.8 and apr-util 1.5.2)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.dewrote:
On 13.11.2013 17:48, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES files:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.dewrote:
On 13.11.2013 17:25, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:41 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:56:58 +0100
Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Personally I think people doing out of tree builds are a minority and
can cope with a small Makefile patch. Theyshould be OK with
[X] Release APR 1.5.0 as GA
(my testing notes elsewhere in this thread)
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfrever@gmail.com wrote:
2013-11-12 18:02 Jeff Trawick napisał(a):
Are there any known issues?
Please fix remaining part of bug #55690 and backport full fix (r1535027,
r1535157, rXXX) to 1.5.x branch.
https
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfrever@gmail.com wrote:
2013-11-12 18:02 Jeff Trawick napisał(a):
Are there any known issues?
Please fix remaining part of bug #55690
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.4.8 and apr-util 1.5.2)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.4.8 and apr-util 1.5.2)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.0 as GA
I'll hold
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES files:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5
.3
autoconf
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
On 11/13/2013 8:48 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES files:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Looking good so far...
FreeBSD 9: gcc, 64-bit builds of apr 1.5.0 and apr-util 1.5.3 fine, only
ran their test suites
RHEL 5-ish box: gcc, 64-bit builds of httpd
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:51 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Wed Nov 13 21:51:02 2013
New Revision: 1541745
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1541745
Log:
Support out of tree build for traditional make.
I guess traditional is any non-GNU make?
This is a regression.
I don't
Index: network_io/unix/sockaddr.c
===
--- network_io/unix/sockaddr.c (revision 1541061)
+++ network_io/unix/sockaddr.c (working copy)
@@ -672,6 +672,10 @@ APR_DECLARE(apr_status_t) apr_getnameinfo(char **h
char tmphostname[256];
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Subj sez it all.
I've never been RM for APR but am willing to do this one...
I'm happy to take care of the RM work.
Some things I'm interested
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:27 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:20:00 +0100
Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On 05.11.2013 22:51, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 05 Nov 2013, at 11:04 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
TIA! (ping
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:29 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:49:22 -0800 (PST)
Arsen Chaloyan achalo...@yahoo.com wrote:
These errors are caused by the use of the new Platform Toolset v120
which gets installed with VS2013. More specifically, the
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:33 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 16:07:37 -0800
Mike Rumph mike.ru...@oracle.com wrote:
On 11/6/2013 1:06 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I just played with _commit() on stdin a bit. It turns out that
_commit(0) fails
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:20 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:43:07 -0500
Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:33 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 16:07:37 -0800
Mike Rumph
.
I have attached a patch that corrects this problem by checking _isatty().
Credit goes to Jeff Trawick for catching this problem in the first place.
Well, there's a lot of unhappiness when you have to answer the
abort/retry/ignore dialog when you run httpd with a debug flavor of apr
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Mike Rumph mike.ru...@oracle.com wrote:
The apr_file_dup2() function in apr/file_io/win32/filedup.c calls
_commit() for standard file handles 0, 1 and 2.
The _commit() function will assert
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
apr-0.9.x has a few fixes queued up, but I don't see any reason to
release
them since httpd 2.0.x is retired.
+1
Not much concern here ;) I can't
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
TIA!
TIA! (ping)
If nobody in the gen_test_char-with-traditional-Windows-build sub-thread
knows what I'm talking about, please let me know. Maybe I am confused
about the planned work.
--
Born in Roswell... married
apr-0.9.x has a few fixes queued up, but I don't see any reason to release
them since httpd 2.0.x is retired.
Index: xdocs/index.xml
===
--- xdocs/index.xml (revision 1538482)
+++ xdocs/index.xml (working copy)
@@ -29,15 +29,6 @@
TIA!
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
It doesn't seem like a hint...
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
There is a need to consume the cmake support downstream, and I see a few
other fixes as well.
(Please no apr-util 1.6 and corresponding rush to cram a bunch of stuff in
there like I and others did with apr 1.5 ;) That can wait.)
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:12 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:17:24 -0400
Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:08 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Oct 29 16:08:31 2013
New Revision: 1536785
Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:01:09 -0400
Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net
wrote:
Just a note
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:22 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.comwrote:
No... the entire dependency is on excluding it from svn. Please remember
that default timestamps in svn are worthless and whatever you checked in is
platform specific.
On Oct 28, 2013 7:02 PM, Jeff Trawick traw
I'd like to see how to tweak the .rc files/build to make it easy to
identify the files properly -- what is the underlying open source
project/version, where did you get them. IOW, route the credit and
liability to the appropriate, different places. That's a good thing for
everybody.
E.g.,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:22 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.comwrote:
No... the entire dependency is on excluding it from svn. Please remember
that default timestamps in svn are worthless and whatever you checked
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:22 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wmr...@gmail.comwrote:
No... the entire dependency is on excluding it from svn. Please
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:08 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Oct 29 16:08:31 2013
New Revision: 1536785
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1536785
Log:
Remove generated file from branches/1.5.x, as it is not present in trunk
the entire revision is needed; I thought somebody
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
Just a note,
On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 10/19/2013 7:26 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net mailto:
g...@gknw.net wrote:
I'd like to first rid
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:01:09 -0400
Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
Just a note,
On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Gregg Smith wrote
apr trunk on Unix:
It gets built then run only after all .o files are generated, so it doesn't
have the expected impact.
.o/.lo/.libs (for gen_test_char) in tools don't get cleaned, so you may
just see the link invocation when you think you're building from scratch.
(I see something else with
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Stefan Ruppert s...@myarm.com wrote:
Am 21.10.2013 20:39, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Stefan Ruppert s...@myarm.com
mailto:s...@myarm.com wrote:
Am 21.10.2013 16:22, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:57
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:57 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Mon Oct 21 12:57:05 2013
New Revision: 1534139
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1534139
Log:
Merge r960671 from trunk:
Only deal with the mutex when XTHREAD is enabled. This increases the
performance of buffered
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Stefan Ruppert s...@myarm.com wrote:
Am 21.10.2013 16:22, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:57 AM, traw...@apache.org
mailto:traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Mon Oct 21 12:57:05 2013
New Revision: 1534139
URL
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
On 10/17/2013 7:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com mailto:
traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
mailto:traw
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Subj sez it all.
I've never been RM for APR but am willing to do this one
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Subj sez it all.
I've never been RM for APR but am willing to do this one...
I'm happy to take care of the RM work.
Some things I'm interested
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't forgotten :) I want to wrap up the apr_shm stuff on Windows
and
finish working through appropriate fixes that aren't in 1.5.x
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
(Sending again from the right mail address, please ignore the other one.)
I've been hanging out in #apr on Freenode recently, but it appears the
intersection of people hanging out there and active APR committers is
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 10/15/2013 02:27 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Or in a more APR-like fashion, add apr_shm_create_ex() and
apr_shm_attach_ex() which have a special processing flag (bitmap). For
Windows, APR_SHM_NS_LOCAL
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
On 12 October 2013 18:48, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
With APR on Windows, creating shared memory or a cross-process mutex
with a
file name parameter results in a resource being created with a Global
prefix
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
On 14 October 2013 15:31, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
On 12 October 2013 18:48, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
With APR
Blame is funny. Changing win32 code breaks a test on FreeBSD and
changing CHANGES can fix it.
I think the issue is in the sendfile test program... Periodically the
server isn't ready yet when the client tries to connect, and some retry
logic that works on Linux (try just the connect again
(whoops, meant to respond to both places; I hate this list setup)
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 02 Oct 2013, at 3:40 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
There is also
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 09 Oct 2013, at 10:34 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
The function is trying to escape any binary values that could
conceivably cause problems when printed to the terminal, whether or not
those values happen
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Mike Rumph mike.ru...@oracle.com wrote:
Thanks Rainer,
The backport looks good!
Perhaps you could also consider applying my doc patch for apr_buckets.h in
bug 55115.
-
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
* Check for anything whatsoever that could be merged from trunk and see
what to do, as presumably there won't be another opportunity for a while
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 01 Oct 2013, at 2:26 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm happy to take care of the RM work.
Some things I'm interested in checking on for 1.5.x:
* Compare 1.4.x-1.5.x and see if anything was missed
I dug into the glitches seen on Windows... \e is a non-portable escape
(GNU extension), and shell escaping treats \n differently on Windows and
OS/2, which the testcase didn't account for.
I guess the code that used \e doesn't match anything in httpd?
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: traw...@apache.org [mailto:traw...@apache.org]
Sent: donderdag 29 augustus 2013 20:49
To: comm...@apr.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1518760 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x:
Here's a simple build script that uses an existing OpenSSL installation and
builds pcre, zlib, libxml2, apr, apr-util, and httpd. Unfortunately it has
a number of dependencies on my own machine, but it should be relatively
easy to see all the configure parameters in one place.
bad about the requirement for
keyboard presses in the middle.) Also, it is a good source of hints for
building the other projects.
Cheers
Mario
On 2 September 2013 14:31, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a simple build script that uses an existing OpenSSL installation
I will be throwing a bit more time at the cmake effort in the short term,
starting with comparing the installed artifacts with those of existing
Windows builds and adding missing pieces to the todo lists. I might not do
much else proactively until my own use of the builds catches up and starts
to
With something easily visible like README.cmake containing appropriate
disclaimers?*
I suspect that build bugs are likely to be found more quickly with the
stable branches just because it fits into more applications and/or
workflows (i.e., more people).
*i.e., probably has bugs in the build, has
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:49 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:47:46 -0400
Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
I plan to spend some time tilting at that windmill starting later this
week, for the purposes of getting a flexible build on Windows
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
This is barely enough to run testapr. For now it is intended only for
Windows. include/apr.hwc is just apr.hw with variables for
APR_HAS_EXPAT
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Tom Donovan donov...@bellatlantic.netwrote:
On 08/20/2013 03:47 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I plan to spend some time tilting at that windmill starting later this
week, for the purposes of
getting a flexible build on Windows. Enough time to get something
@@
-*- coding: utf-8 -*-
Changes for APR 2.0.0
+ *) Add experimental cmake-based build system for Windows. [Jeff
Trawick]
+
Note the list of current bugs/deficiencies in CMakeLists.txt, a lot of
which are handled by Tom's CMakeLists.txt which he posted a couple of hours
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Tom Donovan donov...@bellatlantic.netwrote:
On 08/20/2013 03:47 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I plan to spend some time tilting at that windmill starting later this
week, for the purposes of
getting a flexible build on Windows. Enough time to get something
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:47:46 -0400
Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
I plan to spend some time tilting at that windmill starting later this
week, for the purposes of getting a flexible build on Windows
This is barely enough to run testapr. For now it is intended only for
Windows. include/apr.hwc is just apr.hw with variables for
APR_HAS_EXPAT|LIBXML2. (And sorry about that mixed LF/CR-LF patch.)
I point to the latest Windows binary installs of libxml2 and expat like
this:
set
I plan to spend some time tilting at that windmill starting later this
week, for the purposes of getting a flexible build on Windows. Enough time
to get something working? Dunno :(
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:54 AM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sat Jul 13 15:54:54 2013
New Revision: 1502807
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1502807
Log:
Fix broken test for O_NONBLOCK inheritance.
Followup to r1449570 resp. r1449569 (1.5.x)
resp. r1449568 (trunk) which miss
up a few
minor features including shared library support on MinGW) or we need to get
the MinGW changes into apr-1.4.next.
** **
*Von:* Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
*Gesendet:* Montag, 8. Juli 2013 17:10
*An:* Ervin Bajramovic
*Cc:* APR Developer List
*Betreff:* Re
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Ervin Bajramovic e...@aquasant-mt.comwrote:
Hi All
** **
I tried to build apr-util on a windows xp and windows 7 pc with mingw but
it faild on both pcs with this error message:
What level of APR? What level of APR-Util?
IIRC some support for shared
The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Portable Runtime
Project are proud to announce the General Availability of version
1.4.8 of the APR Apache Portable Runtime library.
APR 1.4.8 provides fixes for a number of bugs present in the
previous release, 1.4.6. We are grateful
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll hold the vote open for 72 hours unless something out of the ordinary
occurs.
Thanks everyone for the testing and providing feedback. as you may have
noticed, I've started rolling out to the mirrors, and I'll
[+1] Release APR 1.4.8 as GA
No build or test suite issues on FreeBSD 9 amd64...
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 1:11 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2013-05-12 17:05, olli hauer wrote:
On 2013-05-05 00:11, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcuts to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-1.4
http
Speak up or not...
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcuts to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-1.4
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-1.4.http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-1.4.7
8
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr-util 1.5.2)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as
I guess we just need the FreeBSD ARM fixes committed and then we can try
for 1.4.8 over the weekend...
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
Does r1487796 (et al) work OK for you guys?
Mine are failing on IPV6. I was a bit confused earlier on.
I swore I
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
confirm test fails on solaris/amd64 too
Unless I've missed something, no one has tested on Windows yet. I'll try
to test that in the next few hours to see if there is anything else obvious
to fix before tagging 1.4.8.
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
confirm test fails on solaris/amd64 too
Unless I've missed something, no one has tested on Windows yet. I'll try
to test that in the next few hours
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Sunday 28 April 2013, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 26.04.2013 21:18, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Some warnings during make check but probably not new:
test/testlockperf.c:229:17: warning: variable 'lockname' set but
not used
101 - 200 of 1573 matches
Mail list logo
