Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcuts to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-1.4
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-1.4.7
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr-util 1.5.2)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr-util 1.5.2)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.4.7 as
I can RM...
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcuts to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5.2
http
The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Portable Runtime
Project are proud to announce the General Availability of version
1.5.2 of the APR Apache Portable Runtime Utility library.
APR-util 1.5.2 provides a number of bug fixes.
(See CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5 for more
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Greg Lazar gregla...@hotmail.com wrote:
**
The apr_file_lock routine, in the version of apr runtime library that I've
currently built uses fnctl which does not appear to be thread safe. I need
to use the worker MPM, so is it recommended that I build the apr
On Wednesday, April 3, 2013, Philip Martin wrote:
Ben Reser b...@reser.org javascript:; writes:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Jeff Trawick
traw...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
I'm not aware of any apr_file_lock() use within httpd, so you wouldn't
regress anything (unless you're
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcuts to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5.2
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5
autoconf version: 2.69 (same
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcuts to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5.2
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5
autoconf version: 2.69 (same
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Christophe JAILLET
christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Le 28/03/2013 19:32, Jeff Trawick a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Monday 25 March 2013, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
As a first step, I noticed
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcuts to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5.2
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5
autoconf version: 2.69 (same
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Nick Kew n...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:27:40 -0400
Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On second thoughts, scrub that.
I'll commit to trunk, but we can't just remove stuff
willy-nilly from 1.5.x. Sorry for the noise.
Umm, is it an API
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Nick Kew n...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:42:12 -0400
Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Nick Kew n...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:27:40 -0400
Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote
Make sense for post-1.5.2?
This doesn't affect non-autoconf builds, and I think the RPM build would be
broken. Any other missing pieces?
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
Index: build/dbd.m4
===
To state the obvious, I'm probably doing something stupid.
I am using Visual Studio 2010 + SP1 (to get around an incremental linking
bug).
I have a directory with:
apr-1.4.x as apr
apr-util-1.5.x as apr-util
apr-iconv-1.1.x as apr-iconv
Within apr-util I try
lnmake -f Makefile.win
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
On 3/30/2013 11:01 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
To state the obvious, I'm probably doing something stupid.
I am using Visual Studio 2010 + SP1 (to get around an incremental linking
bug).
I have a directory with:
apr-1.4.x
at 2:14 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
On 3/30/2013 11:01 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
To state the obvious, I'm probably doing something stupid.
I am using Visual Studio 2010 + SP1 (to get around an incremental
linking
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcuts to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5.2
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as 1.5.1)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (1.5.1 had 2.4.2 Debian-2.4.2-1.1
+/-1
[ ]
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Monday 11 March 2013, Jeff Trawick wrote:
That sounds like a good idea.
I can RM in a few days.
Is there anything important missing? AFAICS, the memcached changes
proposed by Joshua Marantz add a new field
seen fail in httpd-land.)
-Josh
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Joshua Marantz jmara...@google.com
wrote:
ping!
Please don't hesitate
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Monday 25 March 2013, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
As a first step, I noticed that apr_itoa, apr_ltoa, apr_off_t_toa
could be tweaked to require less memory for some common cases.
The attached patch reduces memory use for
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Joe Swatosh joe.swat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've downloaded a few versions of APR and looked into apr.hw on each
of them and I see APR_HAVE_LIMITS_H being set, but I don't see the
equivalent of block like:
/* header files for PATH_MAX, _POSIX_PATH_MAX
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Saturday 16 March 2013, Jeff Trawick wrote:
This would be good to resolve in 1.5.2.
Has anyone else evaluated this? I'm suspicious of the use of a
global pool in the reporter's patch vs. just using malloc()
directly
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Saturday 23 March 2013, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de
wrote:
On Saturday 16 March 2013, Jeff Trawick wrote:
This would be good to resolve in 1.5.2.
Has
This would be good to resolve in 1.5.2.
Has anyone else evaluated this? I'm suspicious of the use of a global
pool in the reporter's patch vs. just using malloc() directly. I
guess the reason for using the pool is that the allocator may have
suitable buffers lying around, but you need one for
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Joshua Marantz jmara...@google.com wrote:
ping!
Please don't hesitate to push back and tell me if I can supply the patch
or
update in some easier-to-digest form. In particular, while I
!
-Josh
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Joshua Marantz jmara...@google.com
wrote:
Is there a mechanism to time out individual operations?
No, the socket connect timeout is hard-coded at 1 second
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
since the APU 1.5.1 apr_password_validate() bug is now fixed (thanks
Rainer!), and our main site http://apr.apache.org/ still lists:
The recommended releases of the several Apache Portable Runtime libraries
are
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org wrote:
Hello Happy People o/~
Seeing Infra's latest email and having done a couple of CMS
migrations in the last year, I would like to offer my
assistance in this endeavour to whomever it may concern.
So long,
On Thursday, November 29, 2012, amitvce wrote:
Hi Everybody,
Can anybody help me here
d...@httpd.apache.org is the list to use for this query
I implemented request fix up phase to manipulate some cookie coming along
with request. I want , in some conditions .. request instead of
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 3:14 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder apr-trunk-fbsd while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-trunk-fbsd/builds/123
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Joshua Marantz jmara...@google.com wrote:
Is there a mechanism to time out individual operations?
No, the socket connect timeout is hard-coded at 1 second and the
socket I/O timeout is disabled.
Bugzilla bug
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Ben Noordhuis i...@bnoordhuis.nl wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Joshua Marantz jmara...@google.com wrote:
Thanks Ben,
That might be an interesting hack to try, although I wonder whether some of
our friends running mod_pagespeed on FreeBSD might run
response-time on a very
active channel.
It is. The ttl is interpreted by the reslist layer, which won't touch
objects until they're returned to the list.
This testing is all using a single memcached running on localhost.
-Josh
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Jeff Trawick traw
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Gavin Shelley columbusmon...@me.com wrote:
The comment says:
/* Try the dead server, every 5 seconds */
but the code looks to try for each request more than 5 seconds after
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Gavin Shelley columbusmon...@me.com wrote:
The comment says:
/* Try the dead server, every 5 seconds */
but the code looks to try for each request more than 5 seconds after the dead
server was first noticed.
If I'm correct, does the following
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 08 Sep 2012, at 5:23 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Enabling a particular crypto library by default would only be done if
--with-crypto was requested. The global default (no crypto) wouldn't
change. But if you enable
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Benson Margulies ben...@basistech.com wrote:
I've explained it. Is the following a bug?
Step 1:
./configure --with-apr=/opt/apr-1.4.6 --with-crypto
include/apu.h:#define APU_HAVE_CRYPTO0
Step 2:
./configure --with-apr=/opt/apr-1.4.6 --with-crypto
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Benson Margulies ben...@basistech.com wrote:
A) would you like a bugzilla?
Not necessary...
b) I agree about the default.
I'll give folks a chance to comment about defaulting to OpenSSL before
changing anything.
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jeff
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 8 Sep 2012, at 13:46, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, on platforms where OpenSSL is installed in a usual location, you only
need
--with-crypto --with-openssl
Why does it work like this? APR-Util
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:17 AM, TROY.LIU 劉春偉 troy@deltaww.com.cn wrote:
Dear all,
I failed in opening the thread feature when configuring on Cygwin on
windows 7.
I find the configure will disable the enable_threads on cygwin and enable
it on mingw. Why?
MinGW is a pure Windows API
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Hi Jeff,
On 14.08.2012 22:48, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Tue Aug 14 20:48:12 2012
New Revision: 1373078
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1373078view=rev
Log:
Merge parts of r896382
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de
wrote:
Hi,
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
It includes many bug fixes and new
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de
wrote:
Hi,
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
It includes many bug fixes and new
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:58 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2012-08-07 21:09, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de
wrote:
Hi,
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
It
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:58 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2012-08-07 21:09, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de
wrote
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 9:29 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Sun Aug 5 13:29:10 2012
New Revision: 1369580
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1369580view=rev
Log:
use standard verbage when pointing to the 1.4.x changes file
remove an entry for a fix which was
for some future issue,
use http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/.
Here is your fix in the apr-util 1.4.x branch:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1362895
(It is also in trunk and 1.5.x.)
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:38 AM, TROY.LIU �⒋��� troy@deltaww.com.cn wrote:
Dear all,
I found a bug and don’t know where to file it. Just send the mail to let
you know.
Bugs can be filed at http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/
But in this case I can confirm the bug and will commit your
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:38 AM, TROY.LIU �⒋��� troy@deltaww.com.cn
wrote:
Dear all,
I found a bug and don’t know where to file it. Just send the mail to let
you know.
Bugs can be filed at http
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Hi all,
Tarballs/zipballs are at
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/autoconf-2.68+libtool-2.4.2/.
Fixed in apr-util is the static build of the apr_crypto interface. Full
CHANGES are here:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Alona Rossen aros...@opentext.com wrote:
Hello,
Build of libapritil-1.lib failed on Windows using VS2008:
1Linking...
1 Creating library Debug\libaprutil-1.lib and object
Debug\libaprutil-1.exp
1apr_dbd.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:00 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@apache.org wrote:
I hope many of you already saw this and might be considering attending
to present whatever short topics you would like during the BarCamp about
our projects!
I'd asked and there is no plan -yet- for any Hackathon
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Bing Swen bs...@pku.edu.cn wrote:
Hi,
After building the httpd-2.4.2 x64 binaries with VS2010, I encountered a
runtime error in the module libhttpd.dll, which alerts that a heap corruption
occurred at somewhere:
file
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
On 4/9/2012 11:04 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Monday 09 April 2012, Rainer Jung wrote:
Do you disagree with the procedure and/or my attempt
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 12:56 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
To the list; I'm sorry about the tone of this discussion. I'm sorry
about the hostility embedded in my response. For the list participants,
Branko and Jeff are right, it doesn't need to be here. I'd respond to
one
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 4/9/2012 11:04 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Monday 09 April 2012, Rainer Jung wrote:
Do you disagree with the procedure and/or my attempt to describe
the normal way this is handled?
No, I agree and I think it
Perhaps it is just my nature to disagree with everybody when there is
some contentious discussion. Or just possibly it is my nature to try
to pull apart what was discussed (or yelled), throw away the most
extreme aspects, and see if there is anything to agree on. (Even in
the absence of past
Some of the behavior here is embarrassing. Yelling about not
following procedures that nobody else even follows as stated,
threatening, whining, crudity or at least making fun of objections to
crudity, extreme defensiveness, etc. do not reflect well on us or our
ability to do anything together.
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 11:23, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Sun Apr 1 15:23:45 2012
New Revision: 1308135
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1308135view=rev
Log:
Backport:
apr_crypto: Ensure the
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 17:04, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 11:23, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Sun Apr 1
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Hi all,
Tarballs/zipballs are at
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/autoconf-2.68+libtool-2.4.2/.
Fixed in apr-util is the static build
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Hi all,
Tarballs/zipballs are at
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/autoconf-2.68+libtool-2.4.2/.
Fixed in apr-util is the static build of the apr_crypto interface. Full
CHANGES are here:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:28 AM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder apr-util-branch-1.4-fbsd
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-util-branch-1.4-fbsd/builds/44
Buildbot URL:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49155 says:
APR_SIZEOF_VOIDP isn't defined as 8 because of the #ifdef WIN64 statement
preceding #define APR_SIZEOF_VOIDP 8 in the apr.hw file. It is supposed be
#ifdef
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote:
In APR 1.4.6 there is still a typo in the statements, causes crashes HTTPD
in eg. setting on logging in mod_rewrite.
In shm.c and apr.hw
#ifdef WIN64
Sould be:
#ifdef _WIN64
Steffen
Does this work for you?
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 03/01/2012 01:19 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Regardless of the APR_SIZEOF_VOIDP issue, it should be _WIN64 in the
.c/.h code. I'll commit that. I guess the attribution to use is the
e-mail address in bug 49155.
_WIN64
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
Call it innocence, call it naive, call it whatever - but APR is an obstacle
to be overcome. There is documentation, but lacks an overview of what/how
apr is used.
X pages long list of variables does not help prepare one
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Mat Booth mat.bo...@wandisco.com wrote:
Hi all,
When using the install target of Makefile.win on Windows, I noticed
that it does not install all the headers necessary for using the
platform specific features of APR. Please see the patch to fix it
below.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Tarballs/zipballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/.
FWIW I plan to review/test later in the day. Thanks for RM-ing.
(I only bothered to say that since there's not any activity in this
thread yet, and I understand
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Tarballs/zipballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/.
Various fixes in there, including hash randomisation, so give it a good
bashing.
Please give your +1/-1:
[+1] Release apr 1.4.6 as GA
Tested here with Visual
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 11:31 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote:
This is what I get when I run the release.sh script against 1.4.5 tag
Interestingly, if I rework release.sh to use branches instead of tags
and give it 1.4.x as an
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
--- Original message ---
From: Jeff Trawick
Please use clean builds of the the autoconf and libtool versions that
Graham used. I hate seeing the autotools versions jumping around as
different people handle TR
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 07 Feb 2012, at 3:02 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Then the use of autoconf 2.68 was premature. Move back to autoconf
2.64, which should be fine. When it works cleanly with 2.68 we can
move forward again.
According
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 08:02 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Libtool is slightly ahead: 2.4 v 2.2.4, but this is not where the
warnings are coming from (mostly).
Actually, that is not correct. If I use 2.2.4 instead of
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 17:00 -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Using the slightly patched tool(s) from Fedora seems like a pain for
others to reproduce exactly, whereas anyone can install autotools of
arbitrary versions
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
What version of autoconf should I have for rolling releases of APR? I'm
getting quite a few warnings and errors with the default on F-16, so I'm
guessing I have to go a bit back, but what to exactly escapes me now...
Use
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Ronen Mizrahi ro...@tversity.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 18:47 -0500, Ronen Mizrahi wrote:
For the time being we resolved it by adding an if not NULL statement
before invoking the
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 19:06 -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Use whatever was used for apr-util 1.4.1 in order to avoid surprises.
OK.
I think that is autoconf 2.68 (says configure)
Yeah, that's what I have on F-16, which
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Marshall Schor m...@schor.com wrote:
On the exports page ( http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ ) this version
of APR-Util is not listed, although other versions are.
Is this correct? We are relying on this to avoid adding a package we plan
to distribute
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 01.02.2012 18:59, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Marshall Schorm...@schor.com wrote:
On the exports page ( http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ ) this
version
of APR-Util is not listed
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 01.02.2012 18:59, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Marshall Schorm...@schor.com wrote:
On the exports page ( http
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:35 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 12/16/2011 3:13 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:04:03AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
Prutha Parikh from Qualys reported a variant
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
http://www.nruns.com/_downloads/advisory28122011.pdf
Should we add some randomization to prevent abuse?
It's hard to anticipate how folks might leverage apr, and how malicious
folks might then seek to exploit
The following patch *seems* to address a couple of issues:
1. crypto library detection run twice (from main configure logic as
well as from APU_CHECK_CRYPTO)
2. crypto enablement depends on enablement of a crypto library, but
forgetting to enable a crypto library silently proceeds without
failing
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Unfortunately not an answer to your questions, but an observation: your mail
had broken line ends. Many lines in the patch were joined into one big line.
Similarly the report mail you sent shortly before had many words
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
The following patch *seems* to address a couple of issues:
The patch is now attached.
Index: configure.in
===
--- configure.in(revision 1212783
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:31 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Fri Oct 1 03:31:56 2010
New Revision: 1003375
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1003375view=rev
Log:
Note bug
Modified:
apr/apr-util/branches/1.3.x/include/apr_memcache.h
Modified:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 7 Dec 2011, at 08:58, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Fixed the 1.4.x branch win32 crypto API and modules
(Mostly by adding missing build files and one API bug)
They can now compile using Mozilla's xulrunner SDK and
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Hi all,
Tarballs/zipballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/.
New in apr-util v1.4 is the apr_crypto interface, and a fix for LDAP on
Solaris. Full CHANGES are here:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 07 Dec 2011, at 7:10 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
stuff to consider before 1.4.1
different autotools versions compared with 1.3.12? (not always a
problem, but could lead to unintended glitches???)
I've been using
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 07 Dec 2011, at 7:32 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Using the same autoconf and libtool as before should cost you less
than 10 minutes, it makes it trivial to review more of the proposed
tarball, and it essentially guarantees
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 07 Dec 2011, at 8:17 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
The People build APR part is irrelevant. The versions of autoconf
and libtool used so far are anything but arbitrary. They are known to
work for APR users on a variety
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 07.12.2011 18:10, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Graham Leggettminf...@sharp.fm wrote:
diff -ru apr-util-1.3.12/build/config.guess
apr-util-1.4.0/build/config.guess
config.guess
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 08 Dec 2011, at 12:56 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
There's a parameter on release.sh which gets passed to apr-util
buildconf. If it is not passed to release.sh it looks like it will
look in ../apr.
As it is not coming
2011/12/7 Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org:
Tagging was done like this:
svn copy https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/branches/1.4.x
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/tags/1.4.1
/me does^Wwould've done
svn cp ^/apr/apr-util/branches/1.4.x/ ^/apr/apr-util/tags/1.4.1
IIRC this is required so that release.sh creates a
command-line-build-able apr-util, which is an expectation of a
release.
(I will go ahead and plead confused in advance just in case.)
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:50 PM, sridhar basam s...@basam.org wrote:
Can someone point me at how best to access the filedescriptor that is part
of the apr_socket_t struct? I have a need to do additional setsockopts on
the socket which aren't covered with APR.
thanks,
Sridhar
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Oscar Pernas os...@pernas.es wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using apr in a process that uses CORBA TAO, for communications. My
problem is that TAO and APR has the same redefinition of a variable.
In apr.h i can see:
typedef int uid_t ;
typedef int pid_t;
typedef int
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 9/29/2011 7:30 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
This is well past the point where one needs to know the Listen
configuration, exact problem symptom, etc. ;) Either way it seems
that there were some oddities around
201 - 300 of 1573 matches
Mail list logo
