On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
I have one dev question for my apr_fnmatch() refactoring
Today we lowercase the two characters (and don't support case-insensitive
range matches at all, I won't change this apr-specific quirk). But IIRC
there
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Sob s...@hisoftware.cz wrote:
Hello,
while experimenting with httpd and IPv6 on WinXP, I found out that it's not
working well.
In short, the code expects that IPv4 mapped addresses and IPV6_V6ONLY socket
option are supported. This is not true for NTs 6.0.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Sob s...@hisoftware.cz wrote:
Hello,
while experimenting with httpd and IPv6 on WinXP, I found out that it's not
working well.
In short, the code expects that IPv4 mapped addresses
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:25 AM, fua...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fuankg
Date: Tue Mar 29 15:25:00 2011
New Revision: 1086625
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086625view=rev
Log:
Backport Windows apr.h.in stuff from HEAD (r892148).
the right way to go here for Windows gunk is to
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Jeff, Niq,
Am 30.03.2011 01:26, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Guenter Knauffua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 30.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
are you really sure this is the right thing? /me
trunk:
looks pretty good here other than the IPv6 detection; I think the only
test failures are also broken with a Visual Foo build
I build like this:
# enable IPv6
export ac_cv_define_sockaddr_in6=yes
export ac_cv_working_getaddrinfo=yes
export ac_cv_working_getnameinfo=yes
export
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
trunk:
looks pretty good here other than the IPv6 detection; I think the only
test failures are also broken with a Visual Foo build
I build like this:
# enable IPv6
export CPPFLAGS=-DIPV6_V6ONLY=27
^
This is also
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:02 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Jeff, I've lost your thread, probably because it's half at httpd.
Just so you know, I did get to spend my hours yesterday and today on 2008R2
with Visual Studio 2010 - mostly on the tasks of rebuilding a VM to which
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 08.04.2011 08:02, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
Jeff, I've lost your thread, probably because it's half at httpd.
Just so you know, I did get to spend my hours yesterday and today on
2008R2
with Visual Studio 2010 -
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:29 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 4/8/2011 9:07 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 08.04.2011 08:02, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
Jeff, I've lost your thread, probably because it's half at httpd.
Just so you know, I did get to spend my hours yesterday
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 08.04.2011 17:45, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
process.h has a cute history
1.4.x:
APR_HAVE defined in apr.hw/apr.h.in; the include is performed in
apr.hw if defined
so apr.h.in needs to add the include if defined
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
the patch is based on 1.4.x; trunk isn't building for me today
I see a blunder already in the timeout / 1000 logic (shouldn't do
that unless timeout 0
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 9:50 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Sat Apr 2 13:50:07 2011
New Revision: 1088023
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088023view=rev
Log:
MinGW/MSYS: Support shared builds of APR, other general improvements
to support of this toolchain.
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 02.04.2011 16:59, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
no, something which is kinda /me giving up on teaching configure to do
it right .
http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/mingw/MWGNUmakefile
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:27 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Tue Mar 29 22:27:32 2011
New Revision: 1086789
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086789view=rev
Log:
catch up with XML changes, supporting only expat for now
though the link of testall fails to resolve
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Nick Kew n...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:36:03 -0400
Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:27 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Tue Mar 29 22:27:32 2011
New Revision: 1086789
URL: http
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 30.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
are you really sure this is the right thing? /me doubt ...
1. its in an internal header - if we want to expoert that function then
it should be moved to a public header
2. if
I was the last to TR 1.3.x, slightly after the first 1.4.x release
IIRC. I don't intend to do that again, and I'm not making any effort
to maintain the branch. But that's just me.
Does anyone else have any intentions to release 1.3.x, or otherwise
believe that there is a need? (Günther?)
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 27.03.2011 16:32, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:57 AM,fua...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fuankg
Date: Sun Mar 27 13:57:28 2011
New Revision: 1085937
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 27.03.2011 16:25, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
I was the last to TR 1.3.x, slightly after the first 1.4.x release
IIRC. I don't intend to do that again, and I'm not making any effort
to maintain the branch. But that's just
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Jeff,
can you please take a look at this commit and verify this is what you
suggested, and that I did it right? If ok, should I proceed and apply all
these to build/apr_hints.m4 across all branches?
looks good here; go
Dear Lazyweb,
I noticed that pollset_create is missing this particular checking for
NODEFAULT, which is present in pollcb_create. Do you know why?
Index: poll/unix/pollset.c
===
--- poll/unix/pollset.c (revision 1084961)
+++
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
Repeating my requests from last year:
I would really like to see r960665 ported back and released in the next
release to fix this Apr issue, before
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:01 PM, n...@apache.org wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Wed Mar 23 16:01:12 2011
New Revision: 1084621
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1084621view=rev
Log:
Decouple apr_xml from reliance on Expat
Build with expat and it's effectively unchanged.
The alternative
I was looking at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1065258 in
consideration of getting it in apr-util 1.3.11 and in doing some
research (finally found
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28395/ociaahan.htm#sthref5358)
I realized there's a signed-ness issue
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Stefan Ruppert s...@myarm.com wrote:
On 23.03.2011 13:02, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jeff Trawicktraw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Bert Huijbenb...@qqmail.nl wrote:
Repeating my requests from last year
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Stefan Ruppert s...@myarm.com wrote:
Jeff,
no there was no reason why I used the apr_int16_t type. I was only happy
that I got the oracle driver on AIX working and did not go further into
details... So go ahead!
Thanks for having a look.
The type is
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 23.03.2011 20:27, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
The type is available with 10.2.0.3 and 11.2.0.2 (and probably for eons).
from 8.1.5 oratypes.h (2000-03-15):
#define ub2 unsigned short
#define sb2 signed short
very cool
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:41 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/23/2011 2:02 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Stefan Ruppert s...@myarm.com wrote:
What about https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49882
Its really a simple patch
the patch is based on 1.4.x; trunk isn't building for me today
the select() bypass needed more help than in the patch attached to the
bug, as the return code wasn't correct
oh, there's another select()
oh, what about WSAPoll()? yep
there's another unhandled WSAPoll() in the pollcb support; I
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
the patch is based on 1.4.x; trunk isn't building for me today
I see a blunder already in the timeout / 1000 logic (shouldn't do
that unless timeout 0). But that's just a minor detail.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Jeff,
Am 21.03.2011 14:58, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
* ensure it is viable to use the MinGW toolchain to build APR on
1.4.x-trunk for the purpose of (at least) me testing simple fixes and
running the test suite and using gcc
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 6:16 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Sun Mar 20 22:16:26 2011
New Revision: 1083599
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1083599view=rev
Log:
Backport r1072165, but mark as experimental in CHANGES and configure --help
for now:
Add new configure
* ensure it is viable to use the MinGW toolchain to build APR on
1.4.x-trunk for the purpose of (at least) me testing simple fixes and
running the test suite and using gcc as another perspective on the
Windows code
* provide at least some help in the area of reviewing/testing to those
willing to
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:33 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/21/2011 9:13 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Changes for APR 1.4.0
+ *) Windows: Default build configurations assume NT or higher at run-time;
+ use Release9x/Debug9x build configurations to support
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Jeff,
Am 21.03.2011 14:58, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
* ensure it is viable to use the MinGW toolchain to build APR on
1.4.x-trunk for the purpose of (at least) me testing simple fixes and
running the test suite and using gcc
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/21/2011 12:56 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
apr 1.4 doesn't link for me (undefined reference to CreateHardLinkW),
That's odd, it's in kernel32.dll. A broken kernel32.dll.a/kernel32.lib file,
perhaps?
part
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
Hi,
APR doesn't use gai_strerror() on Windows (because it's not thread
safe) and apr_streror() return APR does not understand this code
message for failed apr_socket_addr_get() calls. It's not user
friendly.
Please
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 21.03.2011 20:51, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/21/2011 12:56 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
apr 1.4 doesn't link for me (undefined reference
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:35 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/19/2011 5:30 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
(mine, of course)
I can't get Visual C++ 2008 Express to build testlfsabi. The files do
show up in the converted .vcproj file, but no .obj files are created.
Below is my
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:10 AM, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Fri Dec 18 06:10:44 2009
New Revision: 892148
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892148view=rev
Log:
Finish removing apu_config.h[n]w templates, these need synchronization w/unix
This removed the externally
(mine, of course)
I can't get Visual C++ 2008 Express to build testlfsabi. The files do
show up in the converted .vcproj file, but no .obj files are created.
Below is my current attempt at a patch.
I first left out the included files (.h, _include.c) with no apparent
difference. .c not
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
Hi,
APR doesn't use gai_strerror() on Windows (because it's not thread
safe) and apr_streror() return APR does not understand this code
message for failed apr_socket_addr_get() calls. It's not user
friendly.
Please
I've seen some unexpected directions for building apr trunk with
expat. This works for me:
C:\Users\xxx \mingw\bin\mingw-get install mingw32-libexpat
bash-3.1$ ./configure --prefix=foo --with-expat=/c/MinGW
FWIW, as of r1083038, here is what I use:
./configure
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
Repeating my requests from last year:
I would really like to see r960665 ported back and released in the next
release to fix this Apr issue, before Subversion 1.7.0 goes in public beta.
Any concerns out there with this fix
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:13 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/12/2011 7:31 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
lots of fixes awaiting apr 1.4.3, a few fixes awaiting apr-util 1.3.11
there's perhaps even some low hanging fruit in bugzilla, but I think
we're going to need to pull out
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:34 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Sun Mar 6 16:34:46 2011
New Revision: 1078507
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1078507view=rev
Log:
style changes only -- make it look a lot more like the bulk of APR
Modified:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Holger Grandy
holger.gra...@bmw-carit.de wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that - although APR ICONV is made available under Apache License
2.0 according to the website, NOTICE and LICENSE files - the source code
contains license headers using a modified BSD-style license
The patch for APR trunk
* supposedly fixes bugs interpreting the apr_snprintf() retcode on
Windows (untested)
* adds a test for short input buffer (tested on Unix, anticipated
different retcode on Windows supposedly handled)
* adds weasel words to the apr_strftime() documentation since Windows
has
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Mar 8, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Dec 17, 2010, at 11:13 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/17/2010 7:32 AM, Graham Leggett
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Monday 21 February 2011, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Mon Feb 21 12:07:33 2011
New Revision: 1072937
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1072937view=rev
Log:
add hook function args to the hook
Currently the hook function arguments aren't available to the probe
macros. This patch adds it. The function args are available within
the hook macros only with surrounding parens, so that is how they must
be passed to the probe macros.
The args are usable by probe macros only with some
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
What's holding us up for a release of apu-1.4.0?
I just posted a patch for an API change. Thanks for reminding me ;)
2011/1/24 Goetz, Philippe philippe.go...@siemens.com:
Hi,
Here a copy and paste bug fix. This bug is already in trunk.
The fix is already in the 1.4.x branch as well.
THIS REQUIRES A NEW VERSION 1.4.3.
Yes, with no further effort the next release will include this fix.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
1.4.2 was released April 3, 2010, and we had since then some fixes ...
I could probably TR after Dec 17 if there's more interest.
It would be good for some quality time to be spent with bugzilla to
see if there is any
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Sander Temme san...@temme.net wrote:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Looks good here.
If folks find this unproblematic, can someone please commit it? I don't have
karma here.
Thanks,
looks fine to me; starting to try it out now
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Sander Temme san...@temme.net wrote:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Looks good here.
If folks find this unproblematic, can someone please commit it? I don't
have
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Chris Knight
christopher.d.kni...@nasa.gov wrote:
Exactly, the problem only appears on 64-bit Snow Leopard. See my patch in
Bugzilla, which I've verified. (Unsure if the below would also work, been a
long time since I diagnosed.)
What I understood was that
As one of your humble list moderators for some time now, I've saved a
few end users the minor aggravation, perhaps temporary, of subscribing
before posting, and of course rejected hundreds upon hundreds of spam
messages. The number of messages mistakenly accepted to the list (I'm
not saying I did
The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Portable Runtime
Project are proud to announce the General Availability of
version 0.9.19 of the APR Apache Portable Runtime library, and
version 0.9.19 of the companion APR-util Apache Portable Utility
library.
The corresponding
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 13.10.2010 18:54, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Am 13.10.2010 05:24, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
After 3+ days:
2 binding votes in favor (need at least one more)
3 non-binding votes in favor
no votes opposed
+1 for NetWare
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
[+ 1] Release apr 0.9.19 as GA
Thanks...
After 6 days, we have 3 binding votes for release of apr 0.9.19 and
none opposed. There's still time for objections, as we don't have
apr-util 0.9.19 approved yet, and I'll move
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those delivered to the bulk of our
0.9.x users
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
This latest level corrects a build problem on some platforms using the
bundled expat. Let's try to wrap up approval of this follow-up to
0.9.18 in 48 hours (httpd 2.0.next needs it for the enclosed security
fixes
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those delivered to the bulk of our
0.9.x users
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Sander Temme san...@temme.net wrote:
[-1] Release apr-util 0.9.18 as GA
traveling this week, but grabbed necessary items for re-roll when I
saw this; will await a conclusion and re-TR
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 10/11/2010 12:14 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.10.2010 18:56, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Sander Temmesan...@temme.net wrote:
[-1] Release apr-util 0.9.18 as GA
traveling this week
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:10 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Oct 12 01:10:23 2010
New Revision: 1021565
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1021565view=rev
Log:
win32 .mak and .dep files are tracked on this branch
Is this soup yet, or do you suggest the manual, wrowe
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those delivered to the bulk of our
0.9.x users
This latest level corrects a build problem on some platforms using the
bundled expat. Let's try to wrap up approval of this follow-up to
0.9.18 in 48 hours (httpd 2.0.next needs it for the enclosed security
fixes).
The only diffs since 0.9.18 are
* Windows build files
* version
* corrected path
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 09.10.2010 16:19, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 09.10.2010 12:10, Eric Covener wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 6:09 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
Thanks for the efforts to sync up expat, Ranier!
+1!
No need for that. It's a collaborative
Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those delivered to the bulk of our
0.9.x users, it would be great to wrap this up within 48 hours.
(Comments on timing
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 04.10.2010 13:00, Jeff Trawick wrote:
(Both have critical fixes which are currently available only as patches.)
I can TR as long as the trees are ready by approx. Thursday (I'm on
the road next week). It would
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 08.10.2010 17:45, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de
wrote:
On 04.10.2010 13:00, Jeff Trawick wrote:
(Both have critical fixes which are currently available
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 10/5/2010 2:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to trunk? It is
the trunk for that tree now.
Counting up the opinions posted on the list...
[ ] Rename 1.5.x to trunk
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 07 Oct 2010, at 12:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
These choices seem skewed to me. apr is apr-util/trunk is a
different concept than rename 1.5.x to trunk. Conceptually, apr is
apr-util trunk whatever we decide.
I
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 20:01, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 07.10.2010 01:36, schrieb Mike Meyer:
For the record - I'm against the change. RFC 2823 says the Reply-To
header is an originator field, and the list is
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 05.10.2010 22:58, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
does anybody strongly believe that we should get expat fixed in 0.9.x
(whether they have time or not)?
/me asking dumb question:
is it much more work than just copying over from
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to trunk? It is
the trunk for that tree now.
+1
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
(Both have critical fixes which are currently available only as patches.)
I can TR as long as the trees are ready by approx. Thursday (I'm on
the road next week). It would be great to get expat taken care of but
I can't
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 10/1/2010 8:22 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are
not yet available.
Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect
some library
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:52 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 10/1/2010 10:47 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
would be nice if we could get an APR 1.4.x release too for next httpd
releases.
Adapting to this set of changes for apu-0.9.x is far more important than
dealing
with
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
All builds suceeded, all make check ran fine, except for two cases on
Solaris 10 (Niagara). I reran the tests there and couldn't reproduce the
problem. Tests now running in a loop, so far not reproducible.
...
Details
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are
not yet available.
Windows files just now added...
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are
not yet available.
Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect
some library consumers, I hope to get enough feedback within 24
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:41 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 10/1/2010 7:10 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Bill, are you able to prepare the apr-util 1.3.10 source packages for
Windows?
(I don't think those are the .zip files created by the roll script)
Actually, now
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 01.10.2010 04:44, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
Gun - let's simply fix 1.3 and 1.5.x - tell me you are done - and I will
svn rm the
expat/ from 1.4 branch, cp it from the 1.5.x branch. but let's do
thatwith builds
Bill, are you able to prepare the apr-util 1.3.10 source packages for Windows?
(I don't think those are the .zip files created by the roll script)
Tarballs are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. Windows packages are
not yet available.
Due to the inclusion of a fix for a potential DOS that could affect
some library consumers, I hope to get enough feedback within 24 hours
to release.
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-util 1.3.10 as GA
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:13 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 9/30/2010 11:05 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 07:05:09AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
any concerns about the timing?
any additional fixes people would like to see in that release?
1.3.x branch
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:13 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 9/30/2010 11:05 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 07:05:09AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
any concerns about the timing?
any
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:47 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 9/30/2010 6:42 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Yep, looks like NetWare fixes for expat are in 1.5.x but not 1.3.x. I
will probably wait for Günter to say something on the status there.
That seems sensible
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 28 september 2010 13:05
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: intent to TR apr-util 1.3.10 sometime Thursday
any concerns about the timing
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Henry Jen henry...@ztune.net wrote:
OK, I tried this on my OpenSolaris box, and believe I figured out what
is going on.
The dead-lock happens when the initial one worker thread get into idle
first as no tasks are pushed yet, then two push comes in. Under this
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
The submitter says make install bombs if APU_MODULES is empty, even
after other fixes that made it work on Solaris.
testing with apr-1.4.x HEAD
any concerns about the timing?
any additional fixes people would like to see in that release?
See https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49709 and attached
patch.
The patch makes conceptual sense to me, though I haven't studied the
details. Perhaps someone has a head start on learning the apr thread pool
implementation?
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Nick Kew n...@apache.org wrote:
Henry, do you follow this list? If no reply, maybe you (Jeff) should copy
him your post.
I forwarded it to him off-line just in case. Thanks!
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45276
The submitter says make install bombs if APU_MODULES is empty, even
after other fixes that made it work on Solaris.
The check in dso.m4 is already committed.
Supposedly the other fix in Makefile.in is required on AIX. (Is this
purely a
401 - 500 of 1573 matches
Mail list logo
