From: Jeff Trawick
Cliff Woolley wrote:
Is it really correct to return APR_EAGAIN regardless of the return
value of apr_thread_cond_timedwait()? Or is that a bug caused by a
lack of {}'s? This is why we tend to say that you should
always use
{}'s, even if the conditional
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Mladen Turk wrote:
That was the bug.
if not returning whatever apr_thread_cond_timedwait()
returned, why not return APR_TIMEUP instead of APR_EAGAIN?
but like Cliff said I wonder why the retval of
apr_thread_cond_timewait() isn't appropriate?
The fixed patch uses
Mladen Turk wrote:
The fixed patch uses the returning value from apr_thread_cond_timedwait().
Also changed to apr_reslist_timeout_set.
+1...
feel free to nag me off-list tomorrow if nobody has committed it by then and
there are no further objections to resolve
