At 03:38 PM 9/19/2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>At 01:32 AM 9/19/2003, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>>I have a patch (send It back in April) that enable to use the atomic
>>from C++ on WIN32.
>>The problem is the fact that C++ distinguishes unsigned int and LONG
>>mixage as an error.
Never mind my ear
At 01:32 AM 9/19/2003, Mladen Turk wrote:
>I have a patch (send It back in April) that enable to use the atomic
>from C++ on WIN32.
>The problem is the fact that C++ distinguishes unsigned int and LONG
>mixage as an error.
That's our bug, then. Not redeclaring, but we need to make this consisten
> -Original Message-
> From: Mladen Turk
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brian Pane
> >
> > Changes not yet made:
> > - Removal of the old API (I saw two comments in favor
> > of this, including my own; I'll wait for an official
> > 3 +1s and no -1s before I start d
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Pane
>
> Changes not yet made:
> - Removal of the old API (I saw two comments in favor
> of this, including my own; I'll wait for an official
> 3 +1s and no -1s before I start deleting stuff)
> - Return values for the add, subtract, and inc
Thanks to all who provided feedback on the apr_atomic API
changes that I posted last week. Here's the updated patch
that I'm planning to commit; I'll wait a few days in case
more people want to comment.
Things that have changed since the original patch:
- Added a new function apr_atomic_xchg32 to
