A fine summary of the situation.
On Friday, July 12, 2002, at 12:42 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I. We represent all time quantum in the same scale throughout APR. That
scale is in microseconds.
Which is goodness, because we don't ever have to go back to docs and ask,
Does that function
At 01:47 PM 7/12/2002, David Reid wrote
Can someone simply restate what issue needs fixing. No more hand waving or
IRC chats, a simple email explaining the issue and what needs fixed.
I will try to do so in a fair and balanced way;
I. We represent all time quantum in the same scale throughout APR.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I hope this is a balanced and fair summary of the discussion to date.
Lovely.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will
Now my own comments;
I. We represent all time quantum in the same scale throughout APR. That
scale is in microseconds.
Which is goodness, because we don't ever have to go back to docs and ask,
Does that function take seconds or apr time?
II. Performance is an issue, we are attempting to
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 02:42:22PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
And with (III.) above, it just makes good sense to pick new names for this
new type, IF we are going to have a contract with the programmers about
the representation. We can have compatibility macros until the old symbols
