Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 20, 2007, at 7:45 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate [+1] APR-util 1.2.12 OS X 10.4.11, Sol8

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/21/2007 01:45 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate [+1] APR-util 1.2.12 voting closes Friday afternoon/evening. Windows .zip's with all those pesky .mak files on their way by morning. Bill Signatures: OK md5sums :

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 21:32 +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: All tests past with the exception of the following error for sqlite2: prepared select Prepare statement failed! (null) Error in prepared select: rc=70023 prepared query Prepare statement

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread Graham Leggett
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate [ ] APR-util 1.2.12 Just tried to run the test suite for apr v1.2.12, and I got this on RHEL4/amd64: testshm : -Line 254: Error destroying shared memory block (2): No such file or

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Nov 21, 2007 11:29 PM, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate [ ] APR-util 1.2.12 Just tried to run the test suite for apr v1.2.12, and I got this on RHEL4/amd64: well you tested the APR

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread Graham Leggett
Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote: well you tested the APR 1.2.12 this is the APR-UTIL 1.2.12 thread :) Quite aware of that, I didn't have the original thread handy :( Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Nov 21, 2007 11:45 PM, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote: well you tested the APR 1.2.12 this is the APR-UTIL 1.2.12 thread :) Quite aware of that, I didn't have the original thread handy :( Oh, I thought you mixed them up by mistake :) FYI, the

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread Henry Jen
Hi, I tested with the tags/1.2.12 from svn, and got the following on Solaris Express, with built-in iconv instead of apr-iconv. testpass: SUCCESS testmd4 : SUCCESS testmd5 : SUCCESS testdbd : SUCCESS testdate: SUCCESS testxml

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Graham Leggett wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate [ ] APR-util 1.2.12 Just tried to run the test suite for apr v1.2.12, and I got this on RHEL4/amd64: testshm : -Line 254: Error destroying shared memory block (2):

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 18:45 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate [-1] APR-util 1.2.12 Fedora 8, i686 and x86_64, testreslist still hangs exactly the same as with 1.2.11. I guess r595990 didn't fix that problem after all. PS. Tested

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 09:28 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: I did wait for about 5 minutes before killing it. OK, I'll try again. Ah, yes. I should have waited another minute! Passed test on both architectures, so my vote is now +1. Sorry about the false alarm. -- Bojan

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread Graham Leggett
Bojan Smojver wrote: Fedora 8, i686 and x86_64, testreslist still hangs exactly the same as with 1.2.11. I guess r595990 didn't fix that problem after all. Did it hang, or did you abort before it was done? I had to wait a good long while (many minutes), but it was ultimately successful.

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Nov 22, 2007 12:13 AM, Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 18:45 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate [-1] APR-util 1.2.12 Fedora 8, i686 and x86_64, testreslist still hangs exactly the same as with

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Henry Jen wrote: Hi, I tested with the tags/1.2.12 from svn, and got the following on Solaris Express, with built-in iconv instead of apr-iconv. testxlate : FAILED 1 of 1 Line 63: expected 22, but saw 0 Failed TestsTotal FailFailed %

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 00:25 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: Did it hang, or did you abort before it was done? I did wait for about 5 minutes before killing it. OK, I'll try again. -- Bojan

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread Graham Leggett
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate [ X ] APR-util 1.2.12 +1 for RHEL4/x86_64. Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate [ ] APR-util 1.2.12 voting closes Friday afternoon/evening. Windows .zip's with all those pesky .mak files on their way by morning. Bill

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-20 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Nov 21, 2007 2:45 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please provide your input to release the tarball candidate [+1] APR-util 1.2.12 Ubuntu 7.10, x86. All good. testreslist, albeit running for a long time, succeeded. Note that: No driver available for sqlite2. No driver

Re: [Vote] apr-util-1.2.12 candidate in /dev/dist/

2007-11-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote: Ubuntu 7.10, x86. All good. testreslist, albeit running for a long time, succeeded. Yea - it made me cringe. Really hope we can speed this up for the next release cycle :-/ No driver available for sqlite2. No driver available for sqlite3. Yup.