RE: Platform Support in APR 2.x

2009-04-07 Thread Daniel May
) We are currently using CVS, but are planning to migrate to SVN We use Cmake on all *NIX platforms /Daniel -Original Message- From: Paul Querna [mailto:p...@querna.org] Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:03 AM To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Platform Support in APR 2.x I believe Platforms

Platform Support in APR 2.x

2009-03-26 Thread Paul Querna
I believe Platforms that have no one around to support should be removed (svn history will always be there, and they can always be rebuilt). In APR especially the operating systems with different implementations, I would prefer to just remove them if no one wants to keep things up in sync.

Re: Platform Support in APR 2.x

2009-03-26 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Paul Querna wrote: I believe Platforms that have no one around to support should be removed (svn history will always be there, and they can always be rebuilt). In APR especially the operating systems with different implementations, I would prefer to just remove them if no one wants to keep

Re: Platform Support in APR 2.x

2009-03-26 Thread Nick Kew
On 26 Mar 2009, at 10:03, Paul Querna wrote: I believe Platforms that have no one around to support should be removed (svn history will always be there, and they can always be rebuilt). In APR especially the operating systems with different implementations, I would prefer to just remove them

Re: Platform Support in APR 2.x

2009-03-26 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote: Please respond with the Platforms you as a /developer/ are willing to support in APR-2.x. Supporting os390 here. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com

Re: Platform Support in APR 2.x

2009-03-26 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote: I am personally willing to develop for:  - FreeBSD = 7.0-release Mac OS X 10.5+. -- justin

Re: Platform Support in APR 2.x

2009-03-26 Thread Mladen Turk
Paul Querna wrote: I believe Platforms that have no one around to support should be removed (svn history will always be there, and they can always be rebuilt). In APR especially the operating systems with different implementations, I would prefer to just remove them if no one wants to keep

Re: Platform Support in APR 2.x

2009-03-26 Thread Wes Garland
Paul, did you actually mean to collect votes for various UNIX platforms, or to deprecated things like Netware, BeOS, and OS/2? As you likely know, maintaining support for, say, Solaris 8 is probably about as hard as maintaining support for AIX and sure shouldn't be disabled were that the case.

Re: Platform Support in APR 2.x

2009-03-26 Thread Paul Querna
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Wes Garland w...@page.ca wrote: Paul, did you actually mean to collect votes for various UNIX platforms, or to deprecated things like Netware, BeOS, and OS/2? Yes, in the end I wanted to see if anyone actually cares about Netware, BeOS, or OS/2. I suspect the

Re: Platform Support in APR 2.x

2009-03-26 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote: I believe Platforms that have no one around to support should be removed (svn history will always be there, and they can always be rebuilt). In APR especially the operating systems with different implementations, I would