Re: RC6 take 2

2004-08-27 Thread Cliff Woolley
Has anybody gotten apr-util to compile with apr-iconv? I get the following on win32 when building apr-util with apr and apr-iconv all present: apr-util\xlate\xlate.c(181): error C2198: 'apr_iconv_close' : too few arguments for call through pointer-to-function apr-util\xlate\xlate.c(182):

Re: RC6 take 2

2004-08-26 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 09:09:38AM +0100, David Reid wrote: new apr-util tarballs are now available at http://www.apache.org/~dreid/ +1 for these too. Tested using --with-ldap too this time, there are compiler warnings in the LDAP code but nothing critical. joe

Re: RC6 take 2

2004-08-26 Thread David Reid
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Thursday, August 26, 2004 9:09 AM +0100 David Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: new apr-util tarballs are now available at http://www.apache.org/~dreid/ So far I've seen only 1 +1 for a release. Anyone else care to vote? +1. Passes testall for both apr and apr-util on

Re: RC6 take 2

2004-08-26 Thread Brad Nicholes
+1 on NetWare Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com David Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, August 26, 2004 2:09:38 AM new apr-util tarballs are now available at http://www.apache.org/~dreid/ So far

Re: RC6 take 2

2004-08-26 Thread Mladen Turk
David Reid wrote: Thanks. Anyone from the world of windows care to comment... Here are some windows comments :) . Compilation: sha2.c random\unix\sha2.c(461) : warning C4244: '=' : conversion from 'apr_uint64_t' to 'unsigned int', possible loss of data random\unix\sha2.c(507) : warning C4244:

Re: RC6 take 2

2004-08-26 Thread Mladen Turk
David Reid wrote: Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Thursday, August 26, 2004 9:09 AM +0100 David Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: new apr-util tarballs are now available at http://www.apache.org/~dreid/ So far I've seen only 1 +1 for a release. Anyone else care to vote? +1. Passes testall for both

Re: RC6 take 2

2004-08-26 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Thursday, August 26, 2004 6:15 PM +0200 Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I should run the test with verbose: Listed only the one with verbose messages (both SUCCESS and FAIL). I hate to ask this: but have these tests ever worked? I guess it's sucky that some tests fail on Win32,

Re: RC6 take 2

2004-08-26 Thread David Reid
Mladen Turk wrote: David Reid wrote: Thanks. Anyone from the world of windows care to comment... Here are some windows comments :) . Mladen - please don't take this personally - it's not directed at you directly. I had to go for a short break and count to ten before replying to this. I

Re: RC6 take 2

2004-08-26 Thread Graham Leggett
David Reid wrote: If anyone tries to veto the release for these problem they better have such a bloody good technical reason that it would get Saddam out of jail and back onto the streets... Test failures are bugs, and bugs can be fixed in v1.0.1 and beyond. Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s

Re: RC6 take 2

2004-08-26 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Thursday, August 26, 2004 6:41 PM +0200 Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Test failures are bugs, and bugs can be fixed in v1.0.1 and beyond. Exactly. -- justin

Re: RC6 take 2

2004-08-26 Thread Mladen Turk
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Well, I should run the test with verbose: Listed only the one with verbose messages (both SUCCESS and FAIL). I hate to ask this: but have these tests ever worked? I guess it's sucky that some tests fail on Win32, but if they never worked, I don't consider it a

Re: RC6 take 2

2004-08-26 Thread Aaron Bannert
+1 (seems to work fine on Solaris 9/x86) -aaron On Aug 26, 2004, at 1:09 AM, David Reid wrote: new apr-util tarballs are now available at http://www.apache.org/~dreid/ So far I've seen only 1 +1 for a release. Anyone else care to vote? david

Re: RC6 take 2

2004-08-26 Thread Brian W. Fitzpatrick
David Reid wrote: new apr-util tarballs are now available at http://www.apache.org/~dreid/ So far I've seen only 1 +1 for a release. Anyone else care to vote? +1 -Fitz

Re: RC6 take 2

2004-08-26 Thread Mads Toftum
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 12:29:46PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: +1 (seems to work fine on Solaris 9/x86) Success on solaris sparc 8 too with the small detail that I had to disable ipv6 to avoid a segfault in the tcp test. vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall