On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 08:42:29PM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
On 12/9/06, Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:07:20AM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
We should first check whether the libtool developers intentionally
added that blank line; if they can fix the
On 12/12/06, Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 08:42:29PM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
On 12/9/06, Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:07:20AM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
We should first check whether the libtool developers intentionally
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:07:20AM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
We should first check whether the libtool developers intentionally
added that blank line; if they can fix the regression on their side,
it means that the next stable version of libtool will work with older
source tarballs of apr.
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:10:39PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
Secondly, the APR_CHECK_SIZEOF_EXTENDED isn't working for me because the
default for the cross compiled size is 8. However, ssize_t for me is 4.
So, the configure fails. I made this change:
Can't you set ac_cv_sizeof_ssize_t=4 to get
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:34:36PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:10:39PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
Secondly, the APR_CHECK_SIZEOF_EXTENDED isn't working for me because the
default for the cross compiled size is 8. However, ssize_t for me is 4.
So, the configure fails. I
Failed Tests Total FailFailed %
===
testdso 5 4 80.00%
testpipe 9 2 22.22%
testpipe errors are expected. Filesystem pipes on windows do not behave
in a
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 02:55:09PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Failed TestsTotal FailFailed %
===
testdso 5 4 80.00%
testpipe9 2 22.22%
testpipe
If you force dlopen and dlsym to 0, see what happens.
dso/win32/dso.c, is the source we should be compiling, not the
dso/unix/dso.c. Can you check that?
Bob Rossi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 02:55:09PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Failed TestsTotal FailFailed %
Bob Rossi wrote:
Thanks for the quick response. This is the output of my configure run.
Is something obviously wrong here?
also - check that APR_HAS_DSO is 1.
Hi,
Well, here is the compile command.
/bin/sh
/home/bobbybrasko/rcs/svn/vigilant/vigilant/builddir/vigilant-tools/apr/libtool
--silent --mode=compile gcc -mno-cygwin -g -O0 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -I./include
On 12/6/06, Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:16:52AM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
Hi Bob,
On 12/2/06, Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, and oddly enough, the buildconf script fails for me because
build/buildcheck.sh doesn't recognize my libtool
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 08:30:55AM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
The problem appears to be that libtool is now emitting a blank line
before the line that contains the version string; try
$ libtool --version 2/dev/null | sed -e
'/^$/d;s/([^)]*)//g;s/^[^0-9]*//;s/[- ].*//g;q'
Works like a
Bob Rossi wrote:
Hi,
Well, here is the compile command.
/bin/sh
/home/bobbybrasko/rcs/svn/vigilant/vigilant/builddir/vigilant-tools/apr/libtool
--silent --mode=compile gcc -mno-cygwin -g -O0 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -I./include
On 12/6/06, Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 08:30:55AM +1100, John Vandenberg wrote:
The problem appears to be that libtool is now emitting a blank line
before the line that contains the version string; try
$ libtool --version 2/dev/null | sed -e
Bob Rossi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 03:35:21PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Bob Rossi wrote:
Hi,
Well, here is the compile command.
/bin/sh
/home/bobbybrasko/rcs/svn/vigilant/vigilant/builddir/vigilant-tools/apr/libtool
--silent --mode=compile gcc -mno-cygwin -g -O0
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:10:39PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
Hi,
I've successfully cross compiled apr on cygwin to mingw. I've already
had one patch go upstream to autoconf, which fixes a problem
AC_CHECK_SIZEOF.
I have two very small other problems, that need to be sent upstream, and
then
Hi Bob,
On 12/2/06, Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, and oddly enough, the buildconf script fails for me because
build/buildcheck.sh doesn't recognize my libtool --version. I don't know
sed well enough, and thought someone here would quickly be able to spot
the problem. If not, I'll
On 7/12/05, Dan Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dan,
Has anyone build APR 1.1.1 on Cygwin? I found some packages at Cygwin's site
but they were 0.9.5 and 0.9.6.
I tried building the Unix distribution directly but the configure script
dies with decision on anonymous shared
-5253
-Original Message-
From: John Vandenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 12:37 AM
To: Dan Johnson
Cc: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: Building APR with Cygwin?
On 7/12/05, Dan Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dan,
Has anyone build APR 1.1.1 on Cygwin? I
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Dan Johnson wrote:
The problem is that I need to compile using MinGW under Cygwin, and
MinGW doesn't provide any of the shared memory header files (shm.h,
sys/mmap.h, sys/mman.h, etc.) so the test fails.
A quick Google shows that a few other people have had this problem
On 7/13/05, Dan Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is that I need to compile using MinGW under Cygwin, and
MinGW doesn't provide any of the shared memory header files (shm.h,
sys/mmap.h, sys/mman.h, etc.) so the test fails.
Dan,
It sounds like you are building for MinGW, and
21 matches
Mail list logo
