Re: [Bug 45615] "Large Files not supported" with 64-bit build

2017-01-10 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> >> Could you strace (truss?) a simple main() that calls rand() to confirm? > > Even better, Dtrace. > > Regardless I am juggling a few things and will get right on this. Thanks for investigating. Also, when at this,

Re: [Bug 45615] "Large Files not supported" with 64-bit build

2017-01-10 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 01/10/2017 01:12 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Dennis, Good day fine Sir. Firstly, sorry for awaking what seems like a long dead cold bug but it really isn't a "Large Files not supported" bug as opposed to just a message that needs to be tweaked. Indeed yes this is a 64 bit build and so

Re: [Bug 45615] "Large Files not supported" with 64-bit build

2017-01-10 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 01/10/2017 12:57 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: re: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45615 re: long running (blocking?) apr_skiplist test. I think we can close the bug about Large File Support and make

Re: [Bug 45615] "Large Files not supported" with 64-bit build

2017-01-10 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Dennis, Am 10.01.2017 um 13:36 schrieb Dennis Clarke: re: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45615 I think it best to follow up here as per suggestions by Yann and Rainer wherein I can run further tests and experiments to determine what is happening here in these Niagara class

Re: [Bug 45615] "Large Files not supported" with 64-bit build

2017-01-10 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > re: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45615 > re: long running (blocking?) apr_skiplist test. First, is it this test that takes a huge time to complete or was it the same for the previous tests too