Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.16 / 1.2.11 --- apr-util 0.9.15 / 1.2.10

2007-09-04 Thread jean-frederic clere
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > jean-frederic clere wrote: >> Ruediger Pluem wrote: >>> Which test failed? I stumbled across an issue on Solaris that the bind test >>> fails >>> because APR_HAVE_IPV6 was set, but ::1 was not bound on the loopback >>> interface >>> (only 127.0.0.1) on my box. A trus

Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.16 / 1.2.11 --- apr-util 0.9.15 / 1.2.10

2007-09-04 Thread jean-frederic clere
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > jean-frederic clere wrote: >> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>> Please review and vote on those you have time to - reply once or four times, >>> just review those you can as you can; http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ >> I have: >> "testsockets : FAILED 1 of 6" on a

Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.16 / 1.2.11 --- apr-util 0.9.15 / 1.2.10

2007-09-04 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
So far there were positive reports for: - Linux: Fedora 7, i686 and x86_64. CentOS 5, i686 and x86_64. RHEL 4, i686, CentOS 4, x86_64, Ubuntu 7.04 x86, Ubuntu Breezy on a dual amd64. - OS X 10.4.10, MacOSX 10.4.10 on PowerPC - FreeBSD on an Intel Celeron and - NetWare - Solari

Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.16 / 1.2.11 --- apr-util 0.9.15 / 1.2.10

2007-09-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > Thanks all who've tested so far, I won't be leaving the vote open all that > long, given the quick show of support for this release, and the minimal > delta from the last abandoned but well-tested candidate. Oh - does anyone see a reason to leave this release vote

Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.16 / 1.2.11 --- apr-util 0.9.15 / 1.2.10

2007-09-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
jean-frederic clere wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> Which test failed? I stumbled across an issue on Solaris that the bind test >> fails >> because APR_HAVE_IPV6 was set, but ::1 was not bound on the loopback >> interface >> (only 127.0.0.1) on my box. A truss can help to find out. > > bind(3,

Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.16 / 1.2.11 --- apr-util 0.9.15 / 1.2.10

2007-09-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
jean-frederic clere wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Please review and vote on those you have time to - reply once or four times, >> just review those you can as you can; http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I have: > "testsockets : FAILED 1 of 6" on a Solaris9 SPARC Box with > SunSt

Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.16 / 1.2.11 --- apr-util 0.9.15 / 1.2.10

2007-09-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Sander Temme wrote: > > On Sep 3, 2007, at 6:54 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> Please review and vote on those you have time to - reply once or four >> times, >> just review those you can as you can; http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > Good signatures on all, good md5 checksums (but what d

Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.16 / 1.2.11 --- apr-util 0.9.15 / 1.2.10

2007-09-04 Thread jean-frederic clere
Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On 09/04/2007 03:38 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: >> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>> Please review and vote on those you have time to - reply once or four times, >>> just review those you can as you can; http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ >>> >>> [If you want to speed up th

Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.16 / 1.2.11 --- apr-util 0.9.15 / 1.2.10

2007-09-04 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 9/3/2007 at 7:54 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please review and vote on those you have time to - reply once or four times, > just review those you can as you can; http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > [If you want to speed up the eff

Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.16 / 1.2.11 --- apr-util 0.9.15 / 1.2.10

2007-09-04 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 09/04/2007 03:38 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Please review and vote on those you have time to - reply once or four times, >> just review those you can as you can; http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ >> >> [If you want to speed up the effort by comparing the pack

Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.16 / 1.2.11 --- apr-util 0.9.15 / 1.2.10

2007-09-04 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Sep 3, 2007, at 9:54 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please review and vote on those you have time to - reply once or four times, just review those you can as you can; http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ [If you want to speed up the effort by comparing the packages, you can still obtain the

Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.16 / 1.2.11 --- apr-util 0.9.15 / 1.2.10

2007-09-04 Thread jean-frederic clere
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Please review and vote on those you have time to - reply once or four times, > just review those you can as you can; http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > [If you want to speed up the effort by comparing the packages, you can still > obtain the withdrawn packages at htt

Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.16 / 1.2.11 --- apr-util 0.9.15 / 1.2.10

2007-09-04 Thread Mladen Turk
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please review and vote on those you have time to - reply once or four times, just review those you can as you can; http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ [If you want to speed up the effort by comparing the packages, you can still obtain the withdrawn packages at http://apr.

Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.16 / 1.2.11 --- apr-util 0.9.15 / 1.2.10

2007-09-03 Thread Sander Temme
On Sep 3, 2007, at 6:54 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please review and vote on those you have time to - reply once or four times, just review those you can as you can; http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Good signatures on all, good md5 checksums (but what did you do to get the upper case

Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.16 / 1.2.11 --- apr-util 0.9.15 / 1.2.10

2007-09-03 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 20:54 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > +1/-1 Release >[+1] apr-1.2.11 >[+1] apr-util-1.2.10 >[+1] apr-0.9.16 >[+1] apr-util-0.9.15 Fedora 7, i686 and x86_64. CentOS 5, i686 and x86_64. RHEL 4, i686. CentOS 4, x86_64. -- Bojan