Vote: apr-iconv 1.0.2

2005-03-17 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
While the original tarball was prematurely released, I'm reminded (thank you :) that it's at least +3 votes, and 1 more +1 than -1 to bless a release. I deliberately waited to retract the tarball so everyone's votes were correctly re-tallied. So far, Sander votes +1. OtherBill votes -1. Paul

Re: Vote: apr-iconv 1.0.2

2005-03-17 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: If you two (and anyone else with an explicit vote on the apr-iconv 1.0.2 tarball) vote in the next hour it would clarify things quite a bit. My original vote was intended to be +1 for release. Apparently such a vote at this point is of little