On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 12:33:06PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Thursday 20 September 2001 11:53 am, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > IMHO, these discrepancies should be hidden by our API. E.g. we aught to
> > provide both an apr_status_t (with the return results matched up across
> > platforms, a
.
Cc: Bill Tutt; dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: apr_proc_wait status codes.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:53:54PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> IMHO, these discrepancies should be hidden by our API. E.g. we aught
> to provide both an apr_status_t (with the return results matched up
&g
doesn't make sense here. There is
no success or failure, just status.
Ryan
>
> Bill
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bill Tutt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Kevin Pilch-Bisson'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> Sent: Thursda
s that possible is fine with me, as long
as it is possible.
>
> Bill
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bill Tutt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Kevin Pilch-Bisson'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> Sent: Thursday, September 20,
exit code
we can share with you. IMHO exit code is undefined for all other results.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Tutt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Kevin Pilch-Bisson'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:26 PM
Sub
- Tennyson
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Pilch-Bisson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 7:50 AM
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: apr_proc_wait status codes.
Hi all,
I'm the one sort of reponsible for asking for return codes in
apr_proc_wait (and thanks for h
Hi all,
I'm the one sort of reponsible for asking for return codes in
apr_proc_wait (and thanks for how quickly they were added), but now I am
concerned about their portability.
My MSDN page for GetExitCodeProcess says it retrurns either
STILL_ACTIVE or the return code for the process. Meanwhi
