On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 21:08:01 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>From: "Brian Havard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 7:39 PM
>> Actually OS/2 does NOT have the long/short name crap that windows does.
>
>Good point. Quick question ... it does have case insensitivty and drive
From: "Brian Havard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 7:39 PM
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:38:21 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >Canonicalizing first to the truename is required before apr_filepath_common
> >can be
> >trusted on Win32 or OS2, since c:/thislongn
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 03:29:49PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Kevin Pilch-Bisson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 3:08 PM
>
>
> > > > Would there be a way to convert an incomplete path to a complete path?
> > > > (change drive to c:, getpwd, append foo, in t
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:38:21 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[...]
>Canonicalizing first to the truename is required before apr_filepath_common
>can be
>trusted on Win32 or OS2, since c:/thislongname/ is also c:/THISLO~1/
Actually OS/2 does NOT have the long/short name crap that windows does
From: "Kevin Pilch-Bisson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 3:08 PM
> > > Would there be a way to convert an incomplete path to a complete path?
> > > (change drive to c:, getpwd, append foo, in the above example)
> >
> > That is what apr_filepath_merge does for you. You can
From: "Kevin Pilch-Bisson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 11:39 AM
> Sorry, I think it has to do with the way mutt handles pgp signing
> messages. I'm not going to sign this one, so hopefully it won't do so.
>
> Offhand, which pathetic win32 client.
Message is fine, I'm us
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 12:34:39PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Kevin Pilch-Bisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Sorry, I think it has to do with the way mutt handles pgp signing
> > messages. I'm not going to sign this one, so hopefully it won't do so.
> >
> > Offhand, which pathetic w
Kevin Pilch-Bisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry, I think it has to do with the way mutt handles pgp signing
> messages. I'm not going to sign this one, so hopefully it won't do so.
>
> Offhand, which pathetic win32 client.
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Just a guess.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 09:38:21AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Kevin Pilch-Bisson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 7:48 AM
>
> >> Attachment
>
> Huge favor, if you would, look into why all your posts are going in as text
> file
> attachments? At least they
From: "Kevin Pilch-Bisson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 7:48 AM
>> Attachment
Huge favor, if you would, look into why all your posts are going in as text file
attachments? At least they appear so on my pathetic Win32 email client.
To answer your questions:
apr_filepath_m
Here are some things I got from this.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 01:40:02AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Here is what I've worked up thus far for Unix... n'er mind the _more_
> complicated
> Win32 beast [all I could do to get the _root_ parsing finished tonight!]
>
> So feel free to look at
Here is what I've worked up thus far for Unix... n'er mind the _more_
complicated
Win32 beast [all I could do to get the _root_ parsing finished tonight!]
So feel free to look at the server root parse function, and the unix
implementation
of apr_filepath_merge(), and let me know if I've gone off
ns the full path
> using the current directory as a starting point. I can see room for both as
> they do slightly different things.
>
> Basically,
> if I have just a path relative to where I am now ... use apr_realpath
> I want a full path based on a location plus a relative path
e room for both as
they do slightly different things.
Basically,
if I have just a path relative to where I am now ... use apr_realpath
I want a full path based on a location plus a relative path ... use
apr_dir_merge
In some ways I'm not sure we'd ever use apr_realpath in apache, but oth
of the needs.
Comments are welcome.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "David Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "APR Development List"
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 9:55 AM
Subject: apr_realpath
> Did we ever get a point of agreeing if we wanted to add apr_realpath? I
> seem to have deleted the emails concerning it but ISTR that there was a
> patch?
>
> david
>
>
Did we ever get a point of agreeing if we wanted to add apr_realpath? I
seem to have deleted the emails concerning it but ISTR that there was a
patch?
david
16 matches
Mail list logo
