[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfclere 2004/09/27 09:21:16
Modified:buildjlibtool.c
Log:
Use -L path -llib_name instead of path/"lib"lib_name."ext".
That is still not ok because httpd would need something like:
-Brpath=pathname or -Wl,-Brpath-pathname but we only have this informati
--On Monday, July 5, 2004 7:31 PM -0700 Justin Erenkrantz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On Monday, July 5, 2004 2:01 PM +0200 Martin Kraemer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OTOH, I use jlibtool and like it because it works very well, and it is
better suited for adding in support for platforms where sto
--On Monday, July 5, 2004 2:01 PM +0200 Martin Kraemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
OTOH, I use jlibtool and like it because it works very well, and it is
better suited for adding in support for platforms where stock libtool
behaves incorrectly (than aplibtool which is very OS/2 specific).
Justin,
> Maybe this horse has already been beaten to death: what version of
> libtool are you using, and have you tried fixing it?
Yes, I did. But have you looked at the code of libtool yourself?
It's not very "modular", IMHO But let's not fire the libtool
discussion again.
> Still awaiting feedback
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 02:01:44PM +0200, Martin Kraemer wrote:
> OTOH, I use jlibtool and like it because it works very well, and it is
> better suited for adding in support for platforms where stock libtool
> behaves incorrectly (than aplibtool which is very OS/2 specific).
Maybe this horse has
Justin wrote,
> Hello Have you even paid attention to the messages on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> asking for
> an explanation regarding the jlibtool commits? That code has been vetoed
> pending an explanation.
My excuses to the list, and to Justin. I did not mean to "steal" code,
and you are com
--On Monday, July 5, 2004 7:38 AM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
martin 2004/07/05 00:38:39
Modified:buildjlibtool.c
Log:
Update the license, plus minor portability changes
Hello Have you even paid attention to the messages on [EMAIL PROTECTED] asking for
an explanation reg
That license needs to be updated.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:41:11PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> martin 2004/06/29 05:41:11
>
> Added: buildjlibtool.c
> Log:
> Commit the missing jlibtool.c from Justin's
> http://www.apache.org/~jerenkrantz/jlibtool.c --
> It was ref
> --On Tuesday, June 29, 2004 3:31 PM +0200 "Roy T. Fielding"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello? What makes you think you can do that? Aside from having the
> > wrong license, you don't have the right to commit Justin's code unless
> > he tells you to do so on the public mailing list. You
--On Tuesday, June 29, 2004 3:31 PM +0200 "Roy T. Fielding"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello? What makes you think you can do that? Aside from having the
wrong license, you don't have the right to commit Justin's code unless
he tells you to do so on the public mailing list. You should ask him
On Tuesday, June 29, 2004, at 02:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
martin 2004/06/29 05:41:11
Added: buildjlibtool.c
Log:
Commit the missing jlibtool.c from Justin's
http://www.apache.org/~jerenkrantz/jlibtool.c --
It was referenced by "configure --enable-experimental-libtool
11 matches
Mail list logo
