On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 05:14:47PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> [...]
> > Error-checking
> > is something that we pointedly avoid doing in APR.
> [...]
>
> Please tell me this is not a general policy, and that APR has a small
> amount of error checki
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 05:14:47PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
[...]
> Error-checking
> is something that we pointedly avoid doing in APR.
[...]
Please tell me this is not a general policy, and that APR has a small
amount of error checking. Pretty please? I don't advocate pedantic
error checki
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 04:01:35PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
> > what's it really matter? trying to clean up from OOM is near impossible.
It doesn't matter if it's impossible or not. The problem is that we are
in a library, so we can't just write t
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 04:01:35PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
> what's it really matter? trying to clean up from OOM is near impossible.
Which brings me back to my original question: "Why do we have an abort
function?" As you said (I was originally thinking this, but admittedly,
I didn't bring t
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 12:26:32PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > dreid 01/07/07 05:26:32
> > >
> > > Modified:include apr_sms.h
> > >memory/unix apr_sms.c apr_sms_t
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 12:26:32PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > dreid 01/07/07 05:26:32
> >
> > Modified:include apr_sms.h
> >memory/unix apr_sms.c apr_sms_trivial.c sms_private.h
> > Log:
> > Add the abort func
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > > I don't think there is any benefit to this. But, someone else might
> > > be able to chime in and say why we need this functionality. -- justin
> >
> > how do you handle out of memory?
> >
> > palloc is not permitted to return NULL for performance r
> > I don't think there is any benefit to this. But, someone else might
> > be able to chime in and say why we need this functionality. -- justin
>
> how do you handle out of memory?
>
> palloc is not permitted to return NULL for performance reasons. (well
> that plus the massive amounts of le
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 12:26:32PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > dreid 01/07/07 05:26:32
> >
> > Modified:include apr_sms.h
> >memory/unix apr_sms.c apr_sms_trivial.c sms_private.h
> > Log:
> > Add the abort func
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 12:26:32PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dreid 01/07/07 05:26:32
>
> Modified:include apr_sms.h
>memory/unix apr_sms.c apr_sms_trivial.c sms_private.h
> Log:
> Add the abort function into sms. This is largely to keep compatability
> w
10 matches
Mail list logo
