On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 19:36, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 12:07 PM 3/17/2004, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 17:53 -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote:
Care to +1 for backport I'll make it so today?
well, I'm not sure that my involvement in apr warrants a vote, but I'm
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
1.20.2.3 +1 -1 apr-util/misc/apr_rmm.c
1.3.2.2 +10 -2 apr-util/test/testrmm.c
Sander and company - if the final tags of apr 0.9.5 / httpd 2.0.49 can
pick this up - it would be lovely. Well validated.
I'll make sure they get in
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 17:53 -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote:
Care to +1 for backport I'll make it so today?
well, I'm not sure that my involvement in apr warrants a vote, but I'm +1 in
any case :)
Same argument from me here, this bug has forced me to use libmm in a
project already using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrowe 2004/03/16 10:17:33
Modified:misc apr_rmm.c
test testrmm.c
Log:
Fix a signed/unsigned mismatch that caused an underflow.
Patch by Ahab A. eabouzou yahoo.com
Test by Phillip M Chiasson gozer apache.org
cool.
At 12:50 PM 3/16/2004, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrowe 2004/03/16 10:17:33
Modified:misc apr_rmm.c
test testrmm.c
Log:
Fix a signed/unsigned mismatch that caused an underflow.
Patch by Ahab A. eabouzou yahoo.com
Test by Phillip M
Care to +1 for backport I'll make it so today?
well, I'm not sure that my involvement in apr warrants a vote, but I'm +1 in
any case :)
--Geoff
