On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 03:30, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 07:00:42PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
> > On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 16:34, Greg Stein wrote:
> >...
> > All the copying doesn't bother me as much, because it's the same
> > thing that would happen if you did a dozen calls to apr_bri
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Greg Stein wrote:
> The setaside is not your problem. You cannot and should not guess what is
> going to or *might* happen. The brigades are supposed to be about *avoiding*
> copies. If/when a copy *must* be made, then fine. But don't make judgements
> in advance because you *
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 07:00:42PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 16:34, Greg Stein wrote:
>...
> All the copying doesn't bother me as much, because it's the same
> thing that would happen if you did a dozen calls to apr_brigade_write()
> for slightly less than APR_BUCKET_BUFF_SIZ
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 16:34, Greg Stein wrote:
> Ewww... icky implementation... If you have a dozen iovec's where each
> iov_len is slightly less than APR_BUCKET_BUFF_SIZE, then you're going to
> copy the entire thing onto the heap.
>
> > +/* Step 3: if necessary, output the brigade content
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 11:40:41PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
> +{
> +apr_bucket *e = APR_BRIGADE_LAST(b);
> +apr_size_t remaining;
> +char *buf;
> +apr_size_t bytes_written = 0;
> +apr_size_t i;
> +
> +/* Step 1: check if there is a heap bucket at
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:33:37PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 11:50:04AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 11:09:01AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > > As I said when apr-config and apu-config were created, it should ONLY
> > > be used from an indep
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 11:50:04AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 11:09:01AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > As I said when apr-config and apu-config were created, it should ONLY
> > be used from an independently installed APR or APR-UTIL.
>...
> I believe we must continu
I have nothing to add to this conversation other than Justin has my "proxy"
for this stuff. His commentary on this thread perfectly matches what I would
say myself. I believe our ap*-config design is proper, standard, flexible,
and matches our desires and constraints well. Justin has done a great j
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 01:02:15PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:39:30PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > They have all been converted to use apr-config and apu-config.
>
> I can't remember what the problem was that needed to be solved by doing
> this, can you please
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:39:30PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> They have all been converted to use apr-config and apu-config.
I can't remember what the problem was that needed to be solved by doing
this, can you please elaborate? (I'm probably forgetting something..)
> The APR_FIND_APR/APR
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:28:19PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> That is simply not true, because projects like httpd and flood have
> been bundling APR and APR-UTIL since way before apr-config and
> apu-config existed. They should keep doing what they did before, or
> more to the new system.
They
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:22:57PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:13:56PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > Woah there. I'm just talking about apr-config and apu-config. Those
> > scripts are there to help projects find and use and installed version
> > of APR and APR-UT
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:13:56PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> Woah there. I'm just talking about apr-config and apu-config. Those
> scripts are there to help projects find and use and installed version
> of APR and APR-UTIL. I don't have any problem with projects that still
> wish to bundle it i
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 11:50:04AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 11:09:01AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > As I said when apr-config and apu-config were created, it should ONLY
> > be used from an independently installed APR or APR-UTIL.
>
> For those not on the flood
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 11:09:01AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> As I said when apr-config and apu-config were created, it should ONLY
> be used from an independently installed APR or APR-UTIL.
For those not on the flood dev list, we've had this discussion
there before. Basically, I disagree with
I find myself agreeing with Aaron here. We need to revisit this and fix it
correctly...
(Damn - agreeing with Aaron again...)
david
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Bannert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 11:31:46PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 11:23:48PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 05:33:18AM -, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > > jerenkrantz2002/09/18 22:33:18
> > >
> > > Modified:.CHANGES apu-config
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 11:23:48PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 05:33:18AM -, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > jerenkrantz2002/09/18 22:33:18
> >
> > Modified:.CHANGES apu-config.in
> > Log:
> > Add --bindir option to apu-config so that users of APR-u
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 05:33:18AM -, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> jerenkrantz2002/09/18 22:33:18
>
> Modified:.CHANGES apu-config.in
> Log:
> Add --bindir option to apu-config so that users of APR-util have an idea
> where apu-config will end up so that they can do later
19 matches
Mail list logo
