If the copyright holders of those files are content to let us make
those changes (clearly marked as with apr's copy of these files) and
then distribute the modified files with an exception to the GPL, that
is one thing. However, in the new config.guess/config.sub files checked
in for expat I'm not
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> I also tweaked expat's buildconf.sh to match APR's invocation of
> libtoolize so that it shouldn't update with local copies. -- justin
Thanks!
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 02:14:00PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> is one thing. However, in the new config.guess/config.sub files checked
> in for expat I'm not seeing even that notice.
Somehow I screwed up the import on expat's files. Those were the
original files. I have replaced them now to be
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 02:01:06PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> The reason we have local modifications is that we often support
> OSes that the GNU people do not yet support. Most of the changes
> seem to be related to IBM platforms. It would be best if our
> changes got merged in upstream.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:52:30PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> ** I'm very concerned that we have GPL software checked in to our
> repository. config.guess and config.sub are both covered by the GPL.
> There is a special exception that, by my reading, allows us to
> *redistribute* the file, but n
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 04:12:28PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> Why is it that after I do this:
>
> cvs up -C
> make extraclean
> ./buildconf
> ./config.nice
>
> I get this:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root/apache/httpd-2.0-8# cvs up
> M srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/conftools/config.guess
> M srclib
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 04:32:29PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > Is -C even a valid option to cvs up? It gives me an error if I
> > try to use that. So, I don't know what you are trying to do. =)
>
> What version of cvs do you have? :) Yes,
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Is -C even a valid option to cvs up? It gives me an error if I
> try to use that. So, I don't know what you are trying to do. =)
What version of cvs do you have? :) Yes, it's a valid option, at least
on recent cvs'es. man cvs:
Use
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 04:12:28PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> Why is it that after I do this:
>
> cvs up -C
> make extraclean
> ./buildconf
> ./config.nice
Is -C even a valid option to cvs up? It gives me an error if I
try to use that. So, I don't know what you are trying to do. =)
> I
Why is it that after I do this:
cvs up -C
make extraclean
./buildconf
./config.nice
I get this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root/apache/httpd-2.0-8# cvs up
M srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/conftools/config.guess
M srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/conftools/config.sub
--Cliff
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
