[PATCH] Make the worker mpm use the new pools code

2001-12-14 Thread Sander Striker
Hi, This patch will make worker use the new features of the pools code. It also adds a convenient line for debugging purposes (resolves to a NOOP if APR_POOL_DEBUG is not defined). Sander Index: server/mpm/worker/worker.c === RCS

Re: pools code

2001-07-05 Thread rbb
== pools a lot easier and will be part of the patch I submit at the weekend :) BTW, today we managed to get the server serving pages using sms instead of the pools code, with virtually no changes needed to the server code at all. As a starting point it's pretty reasonable :) If the answer

Re: pools code

2001-07-05 Thread rbb
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 09:35:05PM +0100, David Reid wrote: Anyone have objections to moving the apr_pools.c file into the memory/unix directory? No objections here, but I wouldn't worry about the history. Just note that the file originally

Re: pools code

2001-07-05 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 04:08:45PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For moves like this, we usually try to keep the history. That is the way the group has always done it in the past. This has caused arguments before, but I would prefer to keep the history. Oh, I wasn't aware of that policy.

Re: pools code

2001-07-05 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for moving it. To move it without losing history, log on to deadalus, and do the following: +1 for moving it. Definitely keep the history. It's much easier than trying to compare across files. And that's always been the group's consensus after

pools code

2001-07-04 Thread David Reid
a lot easier and will be part of the patch I submit at the weekend :) BTW, today we managed to get the server serving pages using sms instead of the pools code, with virtually no changes needed to the server code at all. As a starting point it's pretty reasonable :) If the answer is no, then can

Re: pools code

2001-07-04 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 09:35:05PM +0100, David Reid wrote: Anyone have objections to moving the apr_pools.c file into the memory/unix directory? No objections here, but I wouldn't worry about the history. Just note that the file originally came from lib/apr_pools.c. If you want to see the