Re: 1.6 apr/apr-util scope/timetable?

2016-12-05 Thread Gregg Smith
On 12/3/2016 4:11 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: As for I, the only problematic VC IDE is 10 because it simply refuses to recognize /implib which is a baked in bug. Instead it names the import library the same as the project so all consumers t

buildbot success in on apr-trunk-fbsd

2016-12-05 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder apr-trunk-fbsd while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-trunk-fbsd/builds/80 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb-fbsd2_64bit Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler sc

buildbot success in on apr-trunk

2016-12-05 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder apr-trunk while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/apr-trunk/builds/67 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: orcus_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler scheduler name

RE: svn commit: r1772803 - in /apr/apr/trunk: CHANGEScrypto/crypt_blowfish.c

2016-12-05 Thread bert
Doesn’t this simple patch break all existing hashes for the existing type? Perhaps this breakage is safe for 2.0, but perhaps it is better to just introduce a new less expensive hash format, while still allowing verifications against the old format. For some of the hash usacases the fact that t

Re: svn commit: r1772803 - in /apr/apr/trunk: CHANGEScrypto/crypt_blowfish.c

2016-12-05 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:38 PM, wrote: > Doesn’t this simple patch break all existing hashes for the existing type? > > No, only those exceeding an absurd number of iterations. 31 iterations takes over a day of CPU at 3Ghz. Perhaps this breakage is safe for 2.0, but perhaps it is better to ju