Re: testpoll

2017-01-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
I didn't realize it referred to the actual line number in the source file... How dumb :) This is on OSX so I'm getting EINTR. Weird. > On Jan 10, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > Am 10.01.2017 um 15:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Occasionally, I get: >> >>

Unresolved reference to ap*

2017-01-10 Thread Hemant Chaudhary
Hi I am getting unresolved reference to ap* objects. I have added apr,apr-util,pcre. Am I missing something. Please help. I am attaching error log . mod_authn_core.o: In function `authn_alias_check_password': mod_authn_core.o(.text+0xff): unresolved reference to ap_merge_per_dir_configs.

Re: [Bug 45615] "Large Files not supported" with 64-bit build

2017-01-10 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 01/10/2017 12:57 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: re: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45615 re: long running (blocking?) apr_skiplist test. I think we can close the bug about Large File Support and make

Re: [Bug 45615] "Large Files not supported" with 64-bit build

2017-01-10 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 01/10/2017 01:12 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Dennis, Good day fine Sir. Firstly, sorry for awaking what seems like a long dead cold bug but it really isn't a "Large Files not supported" bug as opposed to just a message that needs to be tweaked. Indeed yes this is a 64 bit build and so

Re: [Bug 45615] "Large Files not supported" with 64-bit build

2017-01-10 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> >> Could you strace (truss?) a simple main() that calls rand() to confirm? > > Even better, Dtrace. > > Regardless I am juggling a few things and will get right on this. Thanks for investigating. Also, when at this,

testpoll

2017-01-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
Occasionally, I get: testpoll: /Line 816: expected <0>, but saw <4> Anyway I could easily see what test, exactly, is failing? ./testall -v testpoll does nil.

Re: testpoll

2017-01-10 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 10.01.2017 um 15:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Occasionally, I get: testpoll: /Line 816: expected <0>, but saw <4> Anyway I could easily see what test, exactly, is failing? ./testall -v testpoll does nil. Depending on which version of APR you are testing, it should be line 816

Re: testpoll

2017-01-10 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 10.01.2017 um 16:20 schrieb Rainer Jung: Am 10.01.2017 um 15:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Occasionally, I get: testpoll: /Line 816: expected <0>, but saw <4> Anyway I could easily see what test, exactly, is failing? ./testall -v testpoll does nil. Depending on which version of

Re: testpoll

2017-01-10 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 10.01.2017 um 16:20 schrieb Rainer Jung: Am 10.01.2017 um 15:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Occasionally, I get: testpoll: /Line 816: expected <0>, but saw <4> Anyway I could easily see what test, exactly, is failing? ./testall -v testpoll does nil. Depending on which version of

Re: [Bug 45615] "Large Files not supported" with 64-bit build

2017-01-10 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Dennis, Am 10.01.2017 um 13:36 schrieb Dennis Clarke: re: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45615 I think it best to follow up here as per suggestions by Yann and Rainer wherein I can run further tests and experiments to determine what is happening here in these Niagara class

[Bug 45615] "Large Files not supported" with 64-bit build

2017-01-10 Thread Dennis Clarke
re: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45615 I think it best to follow up here as per suggestions by Yann and Rainer wherein I can run further tests and experiments to determine what is happening here in these Niagara class systems. Firstly, sorry for awaking what seems like a long

Re: [Bug 45615] "Large Files not supported" with 64-bit build

2017-01-10 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > re: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45615 > re: long running (blocking?) apr_skiplist test. First, is it this test that takes a huge time to complete or was it the same for the previous tests too