On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 03:39:23PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > (the standard crypt() is generally non-portable and would remain in APR;
> > > > that should solve Ryan's request for a way to hash [not encode]
> > > > passwords)
> > >
> > > We don't have a crypt routine, and there has
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 03:30:56PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The new httpd-2.0 repository is basically working, but now we need to
> populate apr-util, because without it Apache won't build. I am not moving
> anything out of APR that is already there, because that can wait. this is
> j
> > > (the standard crypt() is generally non-portable and would remain in APR;
> > > that should solve Ryan's request for a way to hash [not encode]
> > > passwords)
> >
> > We don't have a crypt routine, and there has been no discussion of putting
> > crypt into APR so far.
>
> htpasswd uses
The new httpd-2.0 repository is basically working, but now we need to
populate apr-util, because without it Apache won't build. I am not moving
anything out of APR that is already there, because that can wait. this is
just meant to get the bare minimum into apr-util so that the Apache
developers
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 03:11:54PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I would really prefer that we keep some way to encode passwords in
> > > APR. This is a portability issue, so -1 (vote, not veto) for removing
> > > md5 from APR.
> >
> > I'm +1 on moving them to apr-util ... MD5 hashing is
> > I would really prefer that we keep some way to encode passwords in
> > APR. This is a portability issue, so -1 (vote, not veto) for removing
> > md5 from APR.
>
> I'm +1 on moving them to apr-util ... MD5 hashing is entirely portable. That
> is also where SHA-1 hashing is located.
>
> (the
>return 1;
> +#else
> +fprintf(stdout,"APR MMAP Test\n*\n\n");
> +fprintf(stdout,"Failed! APR was not built with MMAP.\n");
> +return -1;
> +#endif
>}
Please do not fail with a -1 here. make test checks to determine if we
have failed with a -1 a
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 02:54:33PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Index: Makefile.in
> > > ===
> > > -TARGETS= [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
> > > - [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
> > > +TARGETS= [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
> >
> > md
> > Index: Makefile.in
> > ===
> > -TARGETS= [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
> > - [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
> > +TARGETS= [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
>
> md5 (et. al.) are all moving to aprutil, correct?
I would really prefer that we keep some
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 11:42:06PM +0100, Branko Cibej wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
>...
> > Sure, we'd get it to work on Linux and *BSD. Possily a Solaris and AIX box.
> > But the rest? Eek.
>
> You're an optimist. AIX already gets a few eeks from me. Non-ELF
> platforms are mostly goblins. :-)
O
Three bits I didn't intend to commit, please comment if they
cause problems:
> wrowe 00/12/04 14:26:56
>
> Log:
> A brand new (and -greatly- simplified) test build
> environment for Win32
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.30 +2 -7 apr/test/Makefile.in
>
> Index
Greg Stein wrote:
I think we're going to have to / want to use libtool there, too. libtool
already does it correctly for each platform, and I would *not* be confident
in the slightest of us getting it right. It wouldn't be "a simple shell
script"... I know that much.
+1 on using libtool. I have the
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 4:19 PM
>
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >
> > IMHO, all these win32 buildisms aught to land in helpers/ ... if
> > there is no disagreement I'll drop them there (.mak/.dsp/.dsw).
>
> ./helpers has historically be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> wrowe 00/12/03 20:10:47
>/* Definitions that APR programs need to work properly. */
>#define APR_SSIZE_T_FMT "d"
> +#define APR_SIZE_T_FMT "d"
Darn it... Sorry!
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
> I think we will need to do that. The problem with ampersand modules
> is that they naturally assume that both modules are owned by the same
> groups. If we use one within httpd for apr, then we are assuming that
> everyone doing a writable checkout of httpd should also have a writable
> apr.
> > Won't it need to be different on different platforms? I mean, Windows
> > wants a SOCKET, and I wouldn't put it past M$ to change the sockaddr to
> > some windows specific structure in the future.
>
> The prototype will be the same... that is why we have the apr_os_sock_t
> type.
>
> We sho
> In Subversion, our analogue to "buildconf" checks for the foreign-project
> subdirectories. If they aren't there, an error message is printed out
> describing where/how to get that subdir and install it.
>
> If the auto-checkout modules thing doesn't work, then we can always have
> buildconf che
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 09:27:45AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Hopefully I didn't miss any comments on the mailing list last night
> (where is that archive again?).
>
> Here is enough to look at to make sure I didn't screw anything up. I
> added family and type parameters too so that APR doesn't
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 11:38:32AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > > Here is enough to look at to make sure I didn't screw anything up. I
> > > > added family and type parameters too so that APR doesn't have to bend
> > > > over backwards (i.e., use syscalls) to find that out. We don't k
19 matches
Mail list logo
