Re: FreeBSD 4.2 breakage (?)

2001-02-06 Thread Greg Stein
[ bringing this conversation just to [EMAIL PROTECTED] at this point ] On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 06:09:45PM -0500, Greg Hudson wrote: I spent a good amount of time trying to figure out the right combination to allow us to include string.h and strings.h (which is done by apr_want.h) without

Re: apr_ function prefixes

2001-02-06 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
+1 ... we need these changes, only we have attacked this as time has permitted. My only comment, take this group: apr_get_shm_nameapr_shm_name_get apr_set_shm_nameapr_shm_name_set apr_open_shmem apr_shm_open I'd personally like to see apr_shm_get/set_name

Re: apr_ function prefixes

2001-02-06 Thread Kevin Pilch-Bisson
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 09:21:55PM -0800, Doug MacEachern wrote: there's a number of places where apr (and httpd) is not consistent with prefixes or doesn't use one at all (beyond apr_ or ap_). personally, i like to see functions named with the prefix of the base type (struct) they operate on

Re: cvs commit: apr-util/buckets apr_buckets_heap.c

2001-02-06 Thread rbb
Modified:modules/generators mod_cgi.c mod_cgid.c buckets apr_buckets_heap.c Damn, I committed from too high in my tree. :-( The bucket change was supposed to happen in the next commit. Basically, we try to overallocate in the heap bucket itself, which is incorrect.