On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 05:43:09PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 12:36:09PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 03:11 AM 4/13/2002, you wrote:
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 April 2002 08:52
Do we really have to have the
match the declaration in the .c and the doc, which is template.
Index: srclib/apr/include/apr_file_io.h
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/apr/include/apr_file_io.h,v
retrieving revision 1.120
diff -u -r1.120 apr_file_io.h
---
Kevin Pilch-Bisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 09:07:46AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 05:03:11PM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On Darwin, if there's a link error (in APR-dso, if something goes wrong),
the program will exit without giving a
At 10:27 AM 4/16/2002, Karl Fogel wrote:
Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Windows UUIDs are a helluva better than ours in terms of uniqueness. We
compensate, but Windows does a much better job.
Or if we find that really unclean, then abstract one key portion of
the uuid code and keep it
At 09:32 AM 4/16/2002, you wrote:
brane 02/04/16 07:32:03
Modified:include apr_errno.h
Log:
On Windows, ERROR_PATH_NOT_FOUND is an ENOENT, not an ENOTDIR -- same
as OS/2.
I'm somewhat dubious of this change. Can you please point to the use case
(a specific scenario) that this
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 09:32 AM 4/16/2002, you wrote:
brane 02/04/16 07:32:03
Modified:include apr_errno.h
Log:
On Windows, ERROR_PATH_NOT_FOUND is an ENOENT, not an ENOTDIR --
same as OS/2.
I'm somewhat dubious of this change. Can you please point to the use
case
(a
