Re: Darwin strangeness on apr_exports.h

2002-04-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, this is normal, well... at least it happens on all OS 10.1.x based systems. When 'gcc' switches to old cpp, it correctly handles the file. CFLAGS with --traditional-cpp added force this directly. I.e. it wont try smart mode first. We force

offline for awhile

2002-04-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'll be traveling the next several days, and although not completely offline, might as well be... -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little

RedHat comments on APR using /usr/include/asm/atomic.h

2002-04-29 Thread Blair Zajac
There are some interesting comments from a RedHat developer on why APR should not include /usr/include/asm/atomic.h on Linux platforms at line 160 of apr/include/apr_atomic.h http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63643 Maybe someone more familiar with the atomic code should take a

Re: RedHat comments on APR using /usr/include/asm/atomic.h

2002-04-29 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 02:55:42PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote: There are some interesting comments from a RedHat developer on why APR should not include /usr/include/asm/atomic.h on Linux platforms at line 160 of apr/include/apr_atomic.h

Re: RedHat comments on APR using /usr/include/asm/atomic.h

2002-04-29 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Blair Zajac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are some interesting comments from a RedHat developer on why APR should not include /usr/include/asm/atomic.h on Linux platforms at line 160 of apr/include/apr_atomic.h http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63643 Maybe someone more