On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:05 AM, jor...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Wed Feb 10 10:05:28 2010
New Revision: 908427
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=908427view=rev
Log:
* build/gen-build.py: Sort lists so that the generated
build-outputs.mk is easy to diff across releases.
I'm not sure if this is the best place to post this, but when running `make
check` against the 1.3.12 dist on Solaris x86, the test hangs in testpoll.
Attaching a debugger reveals the following backtrace:
#0 0xfedc9a45 in _portfs () from /lib/libc.so.1
#1 0xfed55c29 in port_getn () from
(oops, sent to Gregory directly)
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Gregory Szorc gregory.sz...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the best place to post this, but when running `make
check` against the 1.3.12 dist on
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 20:47 -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[+1] Release apr-1.3.12
Signatures look good. Checksums looks good.
All tests pass on Fedora 12, i686.
--
Bojan
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Gregory Szorc gregory.sz...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the best place to post this, but when running `make
check` against the 1.3.12 dist on Solaris x86, the test hangs in testpoll.
Attaching a debugger reveals the following backtrace:
#0
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Gregory Szorc gregory.sz...@gmail.com wrote:
what does pstack PID display when it is hung?
3305: ./testall testpoll
fedc9a45 portfs (6, 37, 8110b98, 32, 32, 0)
fef898a6 apr_pollcb_poll (8110b88, , , 806626d, 8047b04,
8047b3c) + 82
Sure; it might be quicker to use LD_LIBRARY_PATH to run the 1.3.12
testall testpoll against apr 1.3.9's libapr before sorting through
individual commits.
The instant I read this, I realized my shell likely had LD_LIBRARY_PATH set.
Sure enough, it was. And, it was pointing to a path that had a
