++1
Finishing my others tests as we speak :)
On Apr 28, 2015, at 9:19 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/28/2015 09:12 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Yeah, that's it, at least from what I can see. If I add a sleep(1)
right after the send_msg, we pass.
To cover the potential
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone else plan on testing/voting in the next 10 hours? I'd like to
see the CVE fix for Windows on its way to the mirrors, or at least find out
that we have more serious problems to deal with. Tentative plan: Hold
OK...
+1: OSX 10.10.3 / Xcode 6.3.1
FreeBSD 10.1 x64
CentOS 6 and 7, x64
Thx for RMing!
On 04/28/2015 09:19 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/28/2015 09:12 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Yeah, that's it, at least from what I can see. If I add a sleep(1)
right after the send_msg, we pass.
To cover the potential regression concern, I'll backport the new test
to 1.5.1 and confirm that it
On 04/25/2015 09:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.2
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.1)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.1)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
On 04/25/2015 09:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
Shortcut to CHANGES:
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5.2
autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.5.1)
libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.5.1)
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
Under FreeBSD 10, I see no issue w/ testpoll.
So it's looking like an OSX issue and not kqueue per-se.
On Apr 28, 2015, at 8:40 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/28/2015 08:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Hmmm... seeing a regression on OSX 10.10.3 w/ Xcode 6.3.1:
% ./testall
Yeah, that's it, at least from what I can see. If I add a sleep(1)
right after the send_msg, we pass.
On Apr 28, 2015, at 9:10 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Could it be that we are seeing a race condition... that the
data isn't available by the time we wakeup and poll?
On Apr
Looks like OSX is returning EINTR?
[EINTR]A signal was delivered before the timeout expired and
before any events were placed
on the kqueue for return.
On Apr 28, 2015, at 8:38 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Hmmm... seeing a regression on
Could it be that we are seeing a race condition... that the
data isn't available by the time we wakeup and poll?
On Apr 28, 2015, at 9:02 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/28/2015 08:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Under FreeBSD 10, I see no issue w/ testpoll.
So it's looking
On 04/28/2015 08:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Under FreeBSD 10, I see no issue w/ testpoll.
So it's looking like an OSX issue and not kqueue per-se.
Fails on FreeBSD 9 (also kqueue)...
Note that this is a new test I added in 1.5.2-dev. The history of that
is something like this:
* I had
On 04/28/2015 08:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Hmmm... seeing a regression on OSX 10.10.3 w/ Xcode 6.3.1:
% ./testall -v testpoll
testpoll: /Line 816: expected 0, but saw 4
FAILED 1 of 23
Failed TestsTotal FailFailed %
Hmmm... seeing a regression on OSX 10.10.3 w/ Xcode 6.3.1:
% ./testall -v testpoll
testpoll: /Line 816: expected 0, but saw 4
FAILED 1 of 23
Failed Tests Total FailFailed %
===
testpoll
On 04/28/2015 09:12 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Yeah, that's it, at least from what I can see. If I add a sleep(1)
right after the send_msg, we pass.
To cover the potential regression concern, I'll backport the new test to
1.5.1 and confirm that it fails for me on FreeBSD 9 and Lion (even if
On 04/28/2015 09:10 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Could it be that we are seeing a race condition... that the
data isn't available by the time we wakeup and poll?
apr_sleep(apr_time_from_sec(1)) before the apr_pollset_poll() makes it
work consistently for me.
BTW, I thought the test was passing
move to dev@apr
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
+1 for release. Tested on AIX/PPC32, HPUX/IA64 and Solaris/x64.
HPUX and AIX had non-regression
On 04/28/2015 04:28 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 4/28/2015 7:34 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/25/2015 09:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Looks like you have enough binding votes now anyway but
[ +1 ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
After 73 hours we have two binding non-zero votes (fortunately in the
On 4/28/2015 1:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/28/2015 04:28 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 4/28/2015 7:34 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/25/2015 09:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Looks like you have enough binding votes now anyway but
[ +1 ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
After 73 hours we have two
On 4/28/2015 7:34 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/25/2015 09:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Looks like you have enough binding votes now anyway but
[ +1 ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
After 73 hours we have two binding non-zero votes (fortunately in the
same direction). Gregg indicated that he may
On 04/27/2015 08:14 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 4/27/2015 4:07 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/27/2015 08:28 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/27/2015 08:15 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/26/2015 11:59 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 4/25/2015 6:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
+/-1
[ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA
20 matches
Mail list logo
