On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> Bill has just pinged me on IRC, and suggested I should
> draw everyone's attention to it, in case folks have
> missed it.
>
> I wrote a brief RELEASE_NOTES at the time I rolled the
> 1.6.1 tarball. It's in svn at /dev/dist/ along with
> the tarba
Bill has just pinged me on IRC, and suggested I should
draw everyone's attention to it, in case folks have
missed it.
I wrote a brief RELEASE_NOTES at the time I rolled the
1.6.1 tarball. It's in svn at /dev/dist/ along with
the tarballs we've just voted to release.
Review and improvement welcom
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:07 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any
> final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release.
> Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates.
>
> +/- votes please
> [ ] Release apr-util 1
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:09 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed,
> and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual
> http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate.
>
> +/- votes please
> [ ] Release apr 1.6.2
72 hr
On Jun 9, 2017 08:07, "William A Rowe Jr" wrote:
As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any
final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release.
Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates.
+/- votes please
[ ] Release apr-util 1.6.0
+1
On Jun 9, 2017 08:09, "William A Rowe Jr" wrote:
With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed,
and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual
http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate.
+/- votes please
[ ] Release apr 1.6.2
+1
On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:07:25 -0400
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> Mind if I push this over a strict C99 test on a POSIX compliant
> system?
Please do!
Here's hoping that whatever problems you may identify are not
regressions or other showstoppers!
> ps: yes any reasonable person that wants access to O
