On 4/4/19 4:56 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
Thank you for the extensive details !
I arrived at a similar sort of discovery but I used a more brute force
method. I did check sources to see that we had new symbols that did not
previously exist and I did have apr headers on the system
Hi Dennis,
Am 04.04.2019 um 20:32 schrieb Dennis Clarke:
On 4/4/19 2:10 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
First off, thanks all who have contributed to the 1.6.0 -> 1.7.0 evolution
in some large or small way. Secondly, thanks to all who reviewed.
May not matter much at this point but on Solaris
Yes, please consult with Rainer, there are still hours to pull back and
rework a 1.7.1 launch.
Thanks for the very complete details.
Please crosscheck if you are each speaking of opteron or sparc flavors.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 1:32 PM Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 4/4/19 2:10 PM, William A Rowe
On 4/4/19 2:10 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> First off, thanks all who have contributed to the 1.6.0 -> 1.7.0 evolution
> in some large or small way. Secondly, thanks to all who reviewed.
>
May not matter much at this point but on Solaris 10 sparc I saw this in
tests :
us=$status; \
First off, thanks all who have contributed to the 1.6.0 -> 1.7.0 evolution
in some large or small way. Secondly, thanks to all who reviewed.
Steffan's concerns are noted, and the resolution does not appear to be
binary breakage, so we should be safe. Shout loudly and quickly if I
misunderstood.
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 13:01:55 -0500
William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Candidate tarballs are at the usual location;
> https://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> For the release of apr-1.7.0
> [ ] +1 looks great!
> [ ] -1 something is broken
+1. Works for me.
Debian (currently my only dev
