Re: Supported Windows versions for APR 2.0 (was Re: [PATCH] Optimize apr_file_info_get(APR_FINFO_SIZE) on Windows)

2019-05-21 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 2:32 PM Ivan Zhakov wrote: > > > > More specifically, I would like to: > > > > 1. Use native Slim Reader/Writer (SRW) locks [1] for apr_rwlock. > > > >Windows SRW locks are extremely performant (100x times) and also the > >current APR implementation has known bugs

Re: Supported Windows versions for APR 2.0 (was Re: [PATCH] Optimize apr_file_info_get(APR_FINFO_SIZE) on Windows)

2019-05-21 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 15:25, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 at 10:58, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > > > > On 19 December 2016 at 06:45, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > > >> > > >> On 17 December 2016 at 21:47, William A Rowe Jr > > >>

Re: Supported Windows versions for APR 2.0 (was Re: [PATCH] Optimize apr_file_info_get(APR_FINFO_SIZE) on Windows)

2019-05-21 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 23:07, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 7:39 AM Eric Covener wrote: >> >> > I would like to propose making Windows 7 / Windows Server 2008 R2 the >> > minimum >> > supported Windows version for APR 2.0. >> > >> > This means that for APR 2.0 we would

Re: svn commit: r1859658 - /apr/site/trunk/doap.rdf

2019-05-21 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:01 AM wrote: > Author: wrowe > Date: Tue May 21 16:00:46 2019 > New Revision: 1859658 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1859658=rev > Log: > s/http:/https:/ - note that usefulinc.com is not so useful, cert CN > mismatch > > --- apr/site/trunk/doap.rdf