Re: FYI... I'm planning to TR apr-1.4.5, apr-util-1.3.12 soon

2011-05-18 Thread Mike Jakubik
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 14:20 -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: It turns out that httpd 2.2.18 has a binary ABI breakage bug which will require a re-roll. If we have our 1.4.4/1.3.11 regressions (Windows debug log, ldap pool cleanup, fnmatch edge case) resolved in new releases in time, that would be

Re: apr 1.4.4 breaks mod_jk

2011-05-18 Thread Mike Jakubik
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 00:53 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: GDB allows to also get details on the values of variables used, step through the code etc. You give gdb two arguments, the path to your httpd binary and the process ID of the CPU consuming process. Once the gdb prompt is shown, you can

apr 1.4.4 breaks mod_jk

2011-05-17 Thread Mike Jakubik
Hello, I have recently discovered while updating my apache22 installation and subsequently apr1 from 1.4.2 to 1.4.4 that mod_jk now causes the apache server to consume 100% cpu and become unresponsive. I have tried recompiling mod_jk with the new apr but that did not help. Below is my environment

Re: apr 1.4.4 breaks mod_jk

2011-05-17 Thread Mike Jakubik
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 17:52 -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: you updated Apache 2.2.x from 2.2.what to 2.2.what? 2.2.17 to 2.2.18. I can however also reproduce the problem in 2.2.17, it seems to be specific to the apr version. (you updated apr 1.4.2 to 1.4.4) PID USERNAMETHR PRI

Re: apr 1.4.4 breaks mod_jk

2011-05-17 Thread Mike Jakubik
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 00:07 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: Thanks for the report. Would you mind opening an issues in Bugzilla? You can choose the Tomcat project and Tomcat Connectors as a component. If it turns out as an APR bug, we can move the issue there later. It would be very helpful, if

Re: apr 1.4.4 breaks mod_jk

2011-05-17 Thread Mike Jakubik
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 00:53 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: If you can find pstack, that will be easier. pstack just takes the process id and writes out the stacks for all threads. My quick search indicates it pstack should exist for FreeBSD. There is a port for this but it only support i386