'just wondering if somebody could spend 5 seconds to give a thought to it
:-).
-Madhu
-Original Message-
From: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 9:35 AM
To: 'dev@apr.apache.org'
Subject: [PATCH] Regarding semun definition
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
'just wondering if somebody could spend 5 seconds to give a thought to it
:-).
yes, this is an good fix (but you knew that already)... I'll commit
later today if nobody beats me to it (staring down gun barrels at the
moment)
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On platforms where the semun union is not available, the APR defines the
semun structure - but I believe the first parameter should be a int val
and not long val. I verified it on HP-UX and Linux (both 32-bit and 64-bit
On 27 Jun 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
So I guess sizeof(long) is 8 bytes on 64-bit HP-UX? sizeof(long) is
still 4 on 64-bit AIX.
$ uname -a
HP-UX nova126 B.11.00 U 9000/785 2010844465 unlimited-user license
$ cat test.c
#include stdio.h
int main()
{
Jeff Trawick wrote:
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On platforms where the semun union is not available, the APR defines the
semun structure - but I believe the first parameter should be a int val
and not long val. I verified it on HP-UX and Linux
was that the
listener_thread hangs while doing a SAFE_ACCEPT.
Thanks,
-Madhu
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:57 AM
To: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Cc: 'dev@apr.apache.org'
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Regarding semun definition in proc_mutex.h
Yep. we compile with the +DD64 option for ansi-c.
-Madhu
-Original Message-
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Jeff Trawick
Cc: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1); 'dev@apr.apache.org'
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Regarding semun
At 01:00 PM 6/27/2002, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
Yep - with HP-UX running on 64-bit Itanium, and using the 64-bit data model.
The side effect of having the long val in the union definition is that
it'll have corrupted the mutex/semaphore while creating the proc_mutex
itself
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On platforms where the semun union is not available, the APR defines the
semun structure - but I believe the first parameter should be a int val
and not
I'm still slogging through tons of email, but was the issue that
it was simply 'long' instead of 'int' (and trusting that the platform/OS
correctly handles things) or that we require a specific physical
size?
FWIW, the current 2.0 implementation is copied from 1.3, so if it's
wrong in one, it's
At 02:17 PM 6/27/2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm still slogging through tons of email, but was the issue that
it was simply 'long' instead of 'int' (and trusting that the platform/OS
correctly handles things) or that we require a specific physical
size?
Ours is simply a HANDLE. End of issue for
On platforms where the semun union is not available, the APR defines the
semun structure - but I believe the first parameter should be a int val
and not long val. I verified it on HP-UX and Linux (both 32-bit and 64-bit
systems).
BTW, we were able to get Apache (2.0.39) to work on the HP-UX /
12 matches
Mail list logo
