On 04/22/2015 06:19 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
(subject says it all)
Coming up shortly...
On 04/23/2015 11:54 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
warnings in test suite with Sun compiler on Solaris 10, some of which is
from relatively new code (not researched, maybe the API is defined in a way
that this compiler will never be
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/23/2015 09:33 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
Should we add https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32643
from PR 55418?
looks reasonable to me (not tested)
I had tested it with:
+ case $host in
+
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
warnings in test suite with Sun compiler on Solaris 10, some of which is
from relatively new code (not researched, maybe the API is defined in a way
that this compiler will never be happy):
testatomic.c, line 208:
On 04/23/2015 12:09 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/23/2015 09:33 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
Should we add https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32643
from PR 55418?
looks reasonable to me (not tested)
I had tested
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/23/2015 12:09 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
Commited in r1675670 (for 1.5.x).
works fine on S10 circa 2008; I removed my --enable-non-portable-atomics
flag (which would bypass the test) and verified that it still uses them
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
(subject says it all)
+1
On 4/23/2015 5:36 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 04/22/2015 06:28 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 4/22/2015 3:19 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
(subject says it all)
Did we ever decide the best way to handle apr_atomic.c on VC 2013+?
PR 57191.
As often as APR is released, it would be nice to get something
On 04/23/2015 09:33 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
(subject says it all)
Should we add https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32643
from PR 55418?
looks reasonable to me (not tested)
Also
On 04/22/2015 06:28 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 4/22/2015 3:19 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
(subject says it all)
Did we ever decide the best way to handle apr_atomic.c on VC 2013+?
PR 57191.
As often as APR is released, it would be nice to get something done
this time around, even if it's not the
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
(subject says it all)
Should we add https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32643
from PR 55418?
Also https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55418#c4 suggests
test suite may be broken for solaris (or is it
On 4/22/2015 3:19 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
(subject says it all)
Did we ever decide the best way to handle apr_atomic.c on VC 2013+?
PR 57191.
As often as APR is released, it would be nice to get something done this
time around, even if it's not the perfect solution. It has to better
than
(subject says it all)
On 04/22/2015 06:28 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 4/22/2015 3:19 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
(subject says it all)
Did we ever decide the best way to handle apr_atomic.c on VC 2013+?
PR 57191.
As often as APR is released, it would be nice to get something done
this time around, even if it's not the
14 matches
Mail list logo
