Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-02-22 Thread William A Rowe Jr
I tally 9 +1 to change to default reply-all semantics, and one +/-0 ENOCARE vote. No votes against. Jeff, would you care to execute the decision with a jira ticket for apmail, or would you like me to execute? Cheers, Bill On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-30 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 28.01.2016 um 05:08 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: [ ] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics [X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics Thanks, Rainer

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-28 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Mario Brandt wrote: > [ ] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics > [x] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics > same here [X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-28 Thread Mario Brandt
[ ] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics [x] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-28 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > [X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics > me too

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-28 Thread Noel Butler
On 28/01/2016 14:10, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > >> [] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics >> [X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics > > Easy choice, but I lived with the old solution

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-27 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > [] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics > [X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics > Easy choice, but I lived with the old solution under the now abandoned Thunderbird - it is proving much

Mailing list semantics

2016-01-27 Thread William A Rowe Jr
I know we are facing an org-wide change of MLA's, but in the meantime... It's been debated a number of times in the past (far, long distant past) but @apr lists operate disjointly with other projects, httpd for certain, unknown how subversion is currently configured. At least three significant

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-27 Thread Branko Čibej
On 28.01.2016 05:10, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr > > wrote: > > > [] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics > [X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics > > > Easy choice, but

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-27 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 22:08 -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > [ ] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics > [x] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics Principle of least surprise. It's a Gotcha that's got me a few times over the years. Thanks for taking the trouble to raise it.

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-27 Thread Gregg Smith
On 1/27/2016 8:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: [ ] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics [X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics Please!