On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I could just check that APR_EOPNOTSUPP is defined ;)
In any case, yeah, I know... but not implemented isn't the
same as not supported, and so I'm not sure the best thing
to do here. So comments/suggestions are welcomed :)
On Apr 15, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
IMO this has to wait for apr 1.6.x. The compelling use case for this is
AF_UNIX sockets, which apr 1.5.x doesn't advertise support for anyway, and
we're not fixing a hole in the advertised API for which this is the only
-Original Message-
From: j...@apache.org [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: vrijdag 24 januari 2014 16:47
To: comm...@apr.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1561041 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.5.x: ./
include/apr_errno.h
Author: jim
Date: Fri Jan 24 15:46:47 2014
New Revision: 1561041
If you've been following this actual thread you will have
seen that this is currently being discussed.
The subversion feedback is useful however; thx!
On Jan 26, 2014, at 6:58 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: j...@apache.org [mailto:j...@apache.org]
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:46 AM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Fri Jan 24 15:46:47 2014
New Revision: 1561041
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1561041
Log:
Merge r1561040 from trunk:
Using UDS, we sometime try ops not supported on UDS. Make this
a known (and therfore handable)
I could just check that APR_EOPNOTSUPP is defined ;)
In any case, yeah, I know... but not implemented isn't the
same as not supported, and so I'm not sure the best thing
to do here. So comments/suggestions are welcomed :)
On Jan 24, 2014, at 3:12 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On
