RE: svn commit: r921306 - /apr/apr/branches/1.5.x/file_io/win32/open.c

2010-03-12 Thread Bert Huijben
-Original Message- From: jfcl...@apache.org [mailto:jfcl...@apache.org] Sent: woensdag 10 maart 2010 12:18 To: comm...@apr.apache.org Subject: svn commit: r921306 - /apr/apr/branches/1.5.x/file_io/win32/open.c Author: jfclere Date: Wed Mar 10 11:18:28 2010 New Revision: 921306

Re: svn commit: r921306 - /apr/apr/branches/1.5.x/file_io/win32/open.c

2010-03-12 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 03/12/2010 11:48 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: Why do we even have this block? CreateHardLinkA is only implemented in Windows 2000 and later, which implies unicode support. (Why support an ansi version of an API that is only implemented on unicode capable systems?) Bert See

RE: svn commit: r921306 - /apr/apr/branches/1.5.x/file_io/win32/open.c

2010-03-12 Thread Bert Huijben
-Original Message- From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com] Sent: vrijdag 12 maart 2010 12:12 To: Bert Huijben Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r921306 - /apr/apr/branches/1.5.x/file_io/win32/open.c On 03/12/2010 11:48 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: Why do

Re: svn commit: r921306 - /apr/apr/branches/1.5.x/file_io/win32/open.c

2010-03-12 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 3/12/2010 4:48 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: Why do we even have this block? Why, indeed? CreateHardLinkA is only implemented in Windows 2000 and later, which implies unicode support. (Why support an ansi version of an API that is only implemented on unicode capable systems?) Because